Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Anderson outshine Beason?


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Yes, it may sound like a dumb topic but I was watching some games from 2010 and Anderson absolutely dominated, also beat Beason statistically and I also know it was a bit hard for Beason who had to change sides due to Davis being injured.

Anderson stats 130 tackles, 4 sacks, 1 int, and 2 force fumbles pretty good for his first full year as a starter

Beason stats 121 tackles, 1 sack, 1 int, 2 force fumbles

Is it possible? :leaving:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Beason in the middle, his natural position? Highly unlikely. Also, Anderson faded near the end of last year once Beason moved back inside... coincidence?

That said, I like Anderson as a player and think he can be a good to very good player for years to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubt it. Beason's on a mission this season, and gonna show why he should've been ranked higher than he was on that player's list. I also believe Anderson is a tad bit overhyped on this forum. He's still a good LB, but he won't outshine Beason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a huge difference between out producing and actually out performing him Anderson never gave up this season and played very well, but this was a contract year.

Anderson's becoming overated if people keep using his stats. I'm never trusting LB stats with an interior as terrible as ours was.

Anderson is dependable, not quite a dynamic playmaker, but he won't drop easy INTS. If he was a little more aware and instinctive he could be really, really good.

I definitely want him back but I sure hope all of his drive wasn't fueled by the contract year.

Anderson Beason and a healthy Davis/Connor is going to be ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a huge difference between out producing and actually out performing him Anderson never gave up this season and played very well, but this was a contract year.

Anderson's becoming overated if people keep using his stats. I'm never trusting LB stats with an interior as terrible as ours was.

Anderson is dependable, not quite a dynamic playmaker, but he won't drop easy INTS. If he was a little more aware and instinctive he could be really, really good.

I definitely want him back but I sure hope all of his drive wasn't fueled by the contract year.

Anderson Beason and a healthy Davis/Connor is going to be ridiculous.

I don't think he was really given a chance by Fox, he was invisible his two years here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anderson has been around a lot longer than 2 years unless you're referencing some other player.

Well he has never gotten a FULL chance to start the whole season. Another great example by Fox coaching, even though he did a good job his first year with 18 tackles and 2 sacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well he has never gotten a FULL chance to start the whole season. Another great example by Fox coaching, even though he did a good job his first year with 18 tackles and 2 sacks.

If there is one position Fox consistently got right during his time in Carolina, it was LB (Morgan over Witherspoon notwithstanding). Perhaps Anderson could have outperformed Diggs, but Diggs was not bad, just not flashy, and neither is Anderson really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Anderson can outshine beason. He will still perform and compliment him. I expect his production to drop if davis can stay healthy, but he'll take care of his side no doubt. We might have one of the best linebacker groups out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After the Chiefs game a 6'5 X would really help in the Red zone. I would also love to add Slayton in FA 
    • But again, you can restock a defense through free agency much easier than offensive skill positions. Spend all our cap space on defense, take a true elite prospect who also happens to fit a position of need in T-Mac, and then use the rest of our picks on defense. Again, every season there’s a smattering of great DL, LB, and DB options in free agency, a Top 10 WR never hits free agency, ever.  The only way you get one is through the draft or giving up 1st round picks in a trade for one. If he’s there when we’re on the clock, he has to be the pick, he’s just that good.  
    • It must be an early Christmas for JT O'Sullivan having Thielen back so he could put a coal in Thielen's stocking every chance he gets.  Honestly, the biggest surprise is not so much the anticipation. There were those moments here and there last year as well. It's that even that one positive quality he had seemingly vanished his first two games to where it looked like it was all but over, only for it to start coming back some until you get exclamation points all over this game film. And some of those throws were under a lot of duress, something I feel is something new. Finally, those deeper shots are starting to land. Not all of them, but enough that defenses may have to start respecting them. No guarantees whether this will end up as more of anomaly but I certainly hope it isn't. The Green Bay game was a sampler of what BY could be. Against KC, we got a meal. If we could start getting these meals regularly, we might actually have something to work with here.
×
×
  • Create New...