Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

nfail.com poll


Peppers90 NC

Recommended Posts

People want Cam to fail, I really don't know what's with the hate towards Cam.

I haven't seen anybody saying they want him to fail. The poll wasn't asking who you want to succeed but who do you think will. A rookie RB is way more likely to look great than a rookie QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and you're surprised because...?

i guess i coulda said surprised rather than saying that i found it interesting

I'd pick ingram too. I sure want Newton to be the opposite but rookie RBs can have phenomenal seasons while it's considered acceptable for a rookie QB to have a rating of 70.

the poll was for their careers, not just rookie season. maybe people voting couldnt distinguish the two either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't seen anybody saying they want him to fail. The poll wasn't asking who you want to succeed but who do you think will. A rookie RB is way more likely to look great than a rookie QB.

Any article I see online about Newton is filled with hate comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll probably catch a lotta heat for this but fug it...

I believe that Marc Ingram may be the second coming of Emmit Smith...

My logic tells me that Ingram will be better...

My heart says, no FUGGIN way, Cam will be the best QB in NFL history...

My logic wins this battle... I hope that Ingram busts though, and Cam supersedes even his own expectations that he places on himself.

Time will tell...

P.S. It's good to be a fan... But I'm a firm believer in... Just because you're a fan doesn't mean that you have to be blind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll probably catch a lotta heat for this but fug it...

I believe that Marc Ingram may be the second coming of Emmit Smith...

My logic tells me that Ingram will be better...

My heart says, no FUGGIN way, Cam will be the best QB in NFL history...

My logic wins this battle... I hope that Ingram busts though, and Cam supersedes even his own expectations that he places on himself.

Time will tell...

P.S. It's good to be a fan... But I'm a firm believer in... Just because you're a fan doesn't mean that you have to be blind.

started loling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ingram is going to be phenomenal, it sucks the saints picked him

especially against small weak DLs.....which until we prove otherwise we got. We desperately need to improve at the DT spot and you can't count on rookies to help right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...