Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bucks looking to grab Diaw or TT or 10?

BOBCATS_BALL!

By BOBCATS_BALL!,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted

UPDATED this in my thread as well, but here you go.

Classic Bobcats:

From Bonnell:

There are definitely serious talks going on between the Charlotte Bobcats and Milwaukee Bucks. Don't know all the particulars yet, but it sounds like the Bobcats could end with the 10th pick and maybe send No. 19 to Milwaukee.

Don't know what veterans are involved, but here's a curiosity: Stephen Jackson and Corey Maggette have similar contract numbers, both in salary size and length of contracts. The Bucks would love to move Maggette. Don't know that the Bobcats would see him as an asset.

Horrible, self-mutilating, and redundant... you know, the usual Bobcats strategy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HeatCheck Newbie

HeatCheck

Posted
Posted

We shouldn't be giving up anything else if we're giving them 9mil in an expiring. We should get the 10th for that alone.

I disagree. We'd atleast have to swap picks and give them the 19th. Then we'd have back to back picks. Diaw is not worth the 10th overall pick, even with that expiring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted

I disagree. We'd atleast have to swap picks and give them the 19th. Then we'd have back to back picks. Diaw is not worth the 10th overall pick, even with that expiring.

It depends, especially if the new CBA will have a hard cap.

Diaw's game itself isn't worth the 10 pick, but his contract is in that case. I've seen plenty similar deals in the past, we all have.

How many times as an NBA fan have you looked at a trade and thought "Wow, they actually did that?"

Problem is, we're always the team that "actually did that."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bes628 Newbie

bes628

Posted
Posted

I disagree. We'd atleast have to swap picks and give them the 19th. Then we'd have back to back picks. Diaw is not worth the 10th overall pick, even with that expiring.

We know he's not worth a 10, but maybe we can fool em :biggrin5:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HeatCheck Newbie

HeatCheck

Posted
Posted

I want the 10th pick, but I'm hoping to get Vucevic with the 19th, so I don't want to give it up.

Yeah I guess if you are looking for Vucevic then 10 would be too high in terms of value. I wouldn't mind snagging him either. I just don't see Diaw alone for the 10th going down.

As long as we aren't trading Thomas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted

Yeah I guess if you are looking for Vucevic then 10 would be too high in terms of value. I wouldn't mind snagging him either. I just don't see Diaw alone for the 10th going down.

As long as we aren't trading Thomas.

I'd be willing to give them TT for the 10th. I'm sure another team would be willing to take Diaw's expiring as well.

Another idea because Maggette's name keeps popping up, what if we took Maggette back with the 10th, and gave them Diaw?

That way we still keep the 19th and makes more sense for both sides because we'd be taking back an older player with a bad contract and giving them an expiring in its place. I don't want Maggette or his contract, but if we can get the 10th and keep the 19th out of it, I'd do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Really?  Back to this again? How many times have I said that I’d prefer to trade back from #1? Too many to count, but as I’ve pointed out, that’s going to be much easier said than done, as once we signal we want to trade back, teams will know we don’t want any of the QBs and they’d target the 2nd pick in a trade instead. All of my “T-Mac at #1” talk has been discussed under two circumstances… the first being that no QB or DE pop before the draft, and that we can’t trade back. But again, I know you don’t like to actually read that stuff when I say it, as I’ve said it numerous times.
    • SCO96
      Chase Daniels breaks down Bryce vs DEN

      By SCO96 · Posted

      Thanks for posting this. While this was far from a great performance, this critique shows what some of us noticed last week. Bryce played "a little better". There is some talent there. But, as you pointed out we really don't have a great pass blocking line for dropping back each down when we are behind. BY has got some bad habits and physical limitations. At times his teammates let him down. The play calling isn't always the best. I hope he can learn from last week and show us some improvement in the Saints game.
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Oh, and yes, I’d take a WR first in this upcoming draft, but again, that’s not in a vacuum I wouldn’t have taken him over the QBs this past year or likely the ones next year either. It’s all relative to who is available in a specific draft, and I don’t think any of the QB’s are worth the risk at #1 this year. Also the fact that you’ve said you would take T-Mac #2 but scoff at him going #1 is just in itself, super weird.  How you can justify a player at #2 but not #1 solely because of their position and with complete disregard to the other players available, is absolutely crazy town talk
×
×
  • Create New...