Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Free Agents in new CBA= players4/5/6 years


Kurb

Recommended Posts

Reps

According to peter king, if they are currently undercontract they are unaffected.

Which makes no sense, but thats peter king...

Relax, folks. All players with four years or more of credited service AND WHO ARE UNSIGNED NOW would be free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

josephperson Panthers would have 19 UFAs under ('09) rules, incl. DeAngelo Williams, James Anderson, Charles Johnson, Dante Rosario, Ryan Kalil (tagged).

basically it's just rolling back the clock to '09 and everyone who should have been able to become UFAs will become that. in some areas this could hurt, but it has the same effect (more or less) on other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me do the math. We're $70 million under cap, we require spend 93 percent of our cap... And free agent market will be floaded with talent? You know what it means??? Shopping spree, bitches!

signing all of our UFAs

Cam Newton(even with the cap)

extending Jon Beason

Barry Coefield

bye bye 70 million dollars. I hope we front load all of those contracts too. Cap heaven. Richardson's salary purge sure sucked but hopefully we forget about that quick and win games again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...