Cam Wants #2 Jersey From Clausen

[CarolinaKat]

Unlike others I dont want Jimmy traded. I dont want him to play, ever, but he has zero trade value so no trade needed. I do think he should give up #2.

[TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam]

I just found this.

http://www.weiketrade.com/Product/Pro3766.Html

It's gotta be faux

[CarolinaVeins]

It's gotta be faux

its just a draft jersey not the official one

[MWCarolina]

Unlike others I dont want Jimmy traded. I dont want him to play, ever, but he has zero trade value so no trade needed. I do think he should give up #2.

why should Clausen just give up his #2????? IF Cam wants it so bad (and i dont think he wants it as bad as people are making it) he will pay for it and Clausen will accept. As for keeping, him, i dont think it's wise to keep him, what if Newton got hurt and Clausen had to play and played better than people think, i say trade him for nothing and keep either Moore or get a vet in.

As for the jersey in the picture, it's either fake or just a draft jersey as someone said.

[chef17]

why should Clausen just give up his #2????? IF Cam wants it so bad (and i dont think he wants it as bad as people are making it) he will pay for it and Clausen will accept. As for keeping, him, i dont think it's wise to keep him, what if Newton got hurt and Clausen had to play and played better than people think, i say trade him for nothing and keep either Moore or get a vet in.

As for the jersey in the picture, it's either fake or just a draft jersey as someone said.

So having a young backup who played well when the starter got injured is a bad thing?

[MWCarolina]

So having a young backup who played well when the starter got injured is a bad thing?

yeah it creates a QB controversy, you dont want QB controversies. As good as it worked out for the Chargers with Rivers, you should also remember that they lost Brees for nothing. personally, i think you should try to trade Jimmy to Seattle who Carroll wanted at USC and then get a vet to help Newton and you still have Moore on that one year tender.

[chef17]

yeah it creates a QB controversy, you dont want QB controversies. As good as it worked out for the Chargers with Rivers, you should also remember that they lost Brees for nothing. personally, i think you should try to trade Jimmy to Seattle who Carroll wanted at USC and then get a vet to help Newton and you still have Moore on that one year tender.

In that situation Clausen would have good trade value. Trading him now is worthless. So instead of trading a guy who has good trade value we should trade him when he has no value? That makes no sense.

[Ares d9]

yeah it creates a QB controversy, you dont want QB controversies. As good as it worked out for the Chargers with Rivers, you should also remember that they lost Brees for nothing. personally, i think you should try to trade Jimmy to Seattle who Carroll wanted at USC and then get a vet to help Newton and you still have Moore on that one year tender.

What a moonbat.

If Jimmy performs well he will either be used as trade bait or retained as our back-up QB. Cam Newton is the man in Carolina regardless of what Jimmy does, there is nothing he can do to create controversy.

[Cat'sGrowl]

What a moonbat.

If Jimmy performs well he will either be used as trade bait or retained as our back-up QB. Cam Newton is the man in Carolina regardless of what Jimmy does, there is nothing he can do to create controversy.

That's the absolute most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

[OneBadassCat]

Clausen can still redeem himself and be the future but he would have to play totally phenomenal.

[Ares d9]

That's the absolute most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

:cam:

[MWCarolina]

In that situation Clausen would have good trade value. Trading him now is worthless. So instead of trading a guy who has good trade value we should trade him when he has no value? That makes no sense.

not really. people would KNOW that he would be cut soon. think about it like this. what kind of trade happened with Drew Brees??? how about Derek Anderson??? it's a good move for Carolina if both turn into great QBs because then you have a choice on who to keep, BUT you likely wont get a trade. the value is already down because of Newton being on the team.

That's the absolute most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

i agree, quarterback controversies happen ALL the time. people didnt expect Derek Anderson to start all that time. people didnt think Warner would create a QB controversy with Leinart and Michael Vick wasnt expected to take the Eagles job last year, the job was supposed to be Kolb, then Kolb got hurt and Vick took the Eagles job and never let it go.

[chef17]

not really. people would KNOW that he would be cut soon. think about it like this. what kind of trade happened with Drew Brees??? how about Derek Anderson??? it's a good move for Carolina if both turn into great QBs because then you have a choice on who to keep, BUT you likely wont get a trade. the value is already down because of Newton being on the team.

i agree, quarterback controversies happen ALL the time. people didnt expect Derek Anderson to start all that time. people didnt think Warner would create a QB controversy with Leinart and Michael Vick wasnt expected to take the Eagles job last year, the job was supposed to be Kolb, then Kolb got hurt and Vick took the Eagles job and never let it go.

False. Clausen has 3 years left on his contract. If he played well next year, Panthers would still have him for 2 years. Either a team would trade for him, or he would stay on our roster.

I don't understand your argument. We don't want Clausen to play well if Newton gets injured? Well every NFL coach must be wrong because I guarantee they all want a backup QB who can play well if the starter gets hurt.

[MWCarolina]

False. Clausen has 3 years left on his contract. If he played well next year, Panthers would still have him for 2 years. Either a team would trade for him, or he would stay on our roster. I don't understand your argument. We don't want Clausen to play well if Newton gets injured? Well every NFL coach must be wrong because I guarantee they all want a backup QB who can play well if the starter gets hurt.

if he's STILL on the roster after playing well than you have the QB controversy, i think it's risky to have QB controversys and no one will trade for him when they KNOW he will be free to have in 2 years. look at Brees, no team traded for him. the point i am trying to make is why keep Clausen??? everyone wanted him gone last year, a team may want him as their future now and may be stupid enough to offer a 5th round pick. Seattle would likely take him on, doubt Washington would due to the fact they like big armed QBs.