btw the redskins are still trying to trade up for a qb

[g5jamz]

I'd take Washington's 2nd and their next year's 2nd or 3rd and swap 2011 1st(s) for a trade.

[jpniner]

You have to be able to trade players to get the cost of the #1 down.

The cost of a #1 is 3,000 points. (reference here), their #10 yields 1300. So if they were going to trade, they would probably go at 2 because it's 400 points less and since we are not likely to take Blaine Gabbert, so going #1 is unnecessary. Their #41 will yield only 490, so getting the labor thing even partially settled would make this deal much easier. I think trading with Cincy would be the best cost effective since it would only cost them the 10 and 41.

Brian Xanders will start calling Denver when we select Cam Newton, fearing a run on QB's. But unfortunately I don't think we will get the call.

or the Panthers could say, "Fug the Points, we need quantity in this draft and will take the Redskins 1st, 2nd and a later round pick"

Do that and you could still get a QB, DT, WR or CB that is highly rated, plus a 2nd round pick we desperately need to draft another good prospect at those same positions.

[MHS831]

NFL Network said they might go as high as #2.

[Kyle82]

I just feel something really interesting is gonna happen Thursday evening :thumbsup:

[Cavscout]

or the Panthers could say, "Fug the Points, we need quantity in this draft and will take the Redskins 1st, 2nd and a later round pick"

Do that and you could still get a QB, DT, WR or CB that is highly rated, plus a 2nd round pick we desperately need to draft another good prospect at those same positions.

I agree

:smash:

[Snowman926]

in order to move 9 spots dwn we'd need there 1st, 2nd, 5th n next yr 1 or 2 since we can't trade players.

[jpniner]

in order to move 9 spots dwn we'd need there 1st, 2nd, 5th n next yr 1 or 2 since we can't trade players.

Or we say, Fug that because we can't get it and can't afford to stay at #1 and only take one player that isn't a sure thing.

Take best available trade offer, screw the charts.

[jasonluckydog]

I would swap 1's for this draft and take their 2nd and next years 1st pick.

[holderoftruth]

Are you allowed to trade future draft picks?

[Mother Grabber]

I would swap 1's for this draft and take their 2nd and next years 1st pick.

I just don't see the value for them to give up that much, but I'd love it if they would.

[SOJA]

Are you allowed to trade future draft picks?

yea I think its one of those "at your own risk" sort of deals....since there is no CBA there is no guarantee that there will be a draft in the future....I doubt that would happen but still

point being is that I highly doubt we trade out of the first pick this year, and as I have been saying for awhile worst year to have a number one

One year after -Suh, Bradford

One year before- Luck

The one year you can't trade players, and are advised not to trade future picks. Sweet Fox thanks a lot jackass

[CarolinaNut]

i would trade with washington for their 1st & 2nd this year and their 2nd next year...if they even have a 2nd next year

take julio jones or fairley...whichever one falls

[section543]

I'd take Washington's 2nd and their next year's 2nd or 3rd and swap 2011 1st(s) for a trade.

I'd take that too. No one in this draft is worth the supposed "3000 points" that a potential #1 could be. SO we have to be willing to bend the trade chart a bit to get some value.

[CatMan72]

Bill Parcells says trading the top pick is extremely difficult because no one wants to pay that much for the pick and then for the player.

...except for Dan Snyder.