I came to a realization today...

[Sword]

if he's not as good as suh then he probably shouldn't get paid more then suh..and i wouldn't hope for any trades since most teams are probably comfortable with all the players in the top 10 and none of them really stand as the ultimate pick they covet.

I'm certainly not going to waver on who i want the Panthers to pick until the pick is made..then we can all just finally move on hopefully, whatever way it goes. However some people probably won't let go either way.

[Jackofalltrades]

if he's not as good as suh then he probably shouldn't get paid more then suh..

Flawed logic.

I don't want Newton or Bowers, I could live with about anyone else.

[Sword]

Flawed logic.

I don't want Newton or Bowers, I could live with about anyone else.

if that's what you think..just don't think a DT is worth the number one pick when you can probably get another guy in the later rounds for cheaper and barely notice the difference.

[davos]

Speakin' of Suh, he may have been that pick that finally elevates Detroit and the funny thing is with Stafford always injured they still have QB problems.

[Jackofalltrades]

if that's what you think..just don't think a DT is worth the number one pick when you can probably get another guy in the later rounds for cheaper and barely notice the difference.

I think you'd notice the difference, Dareus earned his reputation and his ranking, there's a reason he's the consensus #1 DT.

[Sword]

maybe..sometimes it also takes DTs a couple years to play up to a pro-level as well..I mean I'm not going to complain if we draft him if that's who they really want; but I can only seeing it making our D somewhat better in the long run but our offense will continue to be what it is for many more years.

[Jackofalltrades]

Fair enough, but drafting QB isn't likely to make us any better this year either. Dareus is a plug and play, day one starter who makes Beason better by being on the field.

[TruCatzFan]

once again I have been stepped on... read post #12

[Jackofalltrades]

Way too much to read.

[TheRealDeal]

once again I have been stepped on... read post #12

Your post was terrible.

You say Clausen looks retarded, you don't want Gabbert because he has a "homo" aura, you bring up the Heisman and the NC as reasons to draft Cam, etc.

It was honestly one of the worsts posts I've read here.

Then you top it off with "Obviously I know football" which isn't true at all.

My advice? Stop posting.

[Sword]

I guess I'm thinking more long term when I think of taking QB. DT can help long term too, but over the long haul a QB will change a franchise around completely.

[chef17]

maybe..sometimes it also takes DTs a couple years to play up to a pro-level as well..I mean I'm not going to complain if we draft him if that's who they really want; but I can only seeing it making our D somewhat better in the long run but our offense will continue to be what it is for many more years.

How does one pick keep our offense what it is for many more years?

[Sword]

How does one pick keep our offense what it is for many more years?

because we won't have a QB and will have to wait til next year to find a QB who will also have to be developed for years.

[Jackofalltrades]

I guess I'm thinking more long term when I think of taking QB. DT can help long term too, but over the long haul a QB will change a franchise around completely.

A good QB will, I just don't see thar guy in this draft. I do see a great fit for our other glaring need.