Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More foreign makes in NASCAR?


Spike

Recommended Posts

This is all hypothetical of course. The Big 3 are all hurting right now. Toyota has had success. I think its possible at some time to see Mitsubishi, Nissan, Honda, and/or Hundai and Suzuki getting into the NASCAR field(I could also see Pontiac make a comeback if GM ultimately decides to sell the brand).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After thinking about it, how exactly would other manufacturers get in? Do they have to pay? Petition? What?

Well every year NASCAR approves what body style may run in it's series. It will take two years roughly to get in. The first thing that must be submitted for approval is the planned motor package. From there body components mainly the front fascia (or nose) of the car & skin components like hood, roof, decklid and then finally the rear fascia (or tail) of the car.

Then after you have done all your research & submissions you have to sign some teams to your Brand unless you coming with a team much like Toyota did with Red Bull & MWR. Also like the Dodges did with Petty & Evernham.

It's a timely process and what sucks is your first year is sure to suck in the series regardless of how much money you throw in to the fire! :D

Hopefully this gives you a little insight to the process! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes appreciated. Although, the CoT could make the process a little faster since the cars are all essentially dopplegangers now. A much less broad starting point.

And that statement right there is why a start up team will suck their first year in competition!!!

This where I need a "Hell Yeah" from Red Wing!

Amanda --- Where are you?!?! :D

There is more adjustablity in these COT's than you would think, but yes not as much as the old Monte Carlo's. :(

and don't let the media fool ya into believing that the teams just need a handfull of cars because of their universal fit from Short Track to Super Speedway ..... We still have at least 14 cars per team! :rolleyes:

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the COT pretty much makes it seem like a firm starting ground.. but that car (technically) for a "new brand" wouldn't be anything like their factory tested cars.... thusly they'd be "new" and have the first season to get their (technically) testing in... but, while in a race, I'd gather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...