Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton only similar to one successful QB in last 5 years..


TheRealDeal

Recommended Posts

How do you feel not knowing the difference between a shotgun formation with multiple receivers and the spread option?

Auburn's offense is actually a modified "I" formation that is run out of the shotgun. It has 2 backs and either a tight end or a wide receiver. It isn't a "spread" which is what Gabbert ran with mostly 4 and 5 WR sets.

There are a lot of components that are actually more transferable to the NFL than some traditional spread formations, especially post snap, because it is still based on the principles of run heavy and play action and traditional progressions (although there was some one read and run plays by design especially early in the season).

What he doesn't have right now is knowledge of the language he is going to have to speak and doesn't have a lot of experience with pre-snap reads. But believe it or not almost all QBs have to relearn this when they come out of college even if they come from a pro style offense. Even Clausen who supposedly ran the same offense at ND had problems relaying the plays to teammates last season. Verbiage changes from team to team.

I referred to a story in a previous post (maybe in this thread) about Brad Johnson in Tampa Bay. He never could figure out Gruden's language. And he was a seasoned NFL QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not only the verbiage but the concepts and route combinations he will be seeing.

He really struggled talking about the design and concept of the plays he's run countless times. It'll be tough for him to go from such basic concepts that he could barely explain to complex NFL schemes where he is required to be on the same page as his receivers who are also making reads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Can we stop with the stupid attention whore hot take type posts and just enjoy a winning streak for once? 
    • Every player has faults, and many times they can be categorized neatly into obvious traits that make analysis pretty straight-forward. A running back who thrives in zone schemes where their vision and patience is rewarded may struggle when asked to play a physical, violent, north-south style. A quarterback who can make every throw under the sun may never grasp the schematic purpose of the plays he is being asked to run and therefore constantly makes the wrong decision or no decision even with players running free. But the narrative for Bryce Young has almost consistently focused on his size and overall physicality in a league full of supermen, and how it places a hard limit on his ability to do things like shrug off blockers or throw tactical nuclear strikes from 80 yards out. Two seasons plus in hasn't put those concerns fully to rest, but if there is one underlining trait that could potentially derail Bryce's career, it's much more nebulous: his ability to recognize when a play is dead. The proclivity for turnovers that has haunted Bryce through his career doesn't always have the same underlying reasons as most typical young quarterbacks: adjusting to the speed of play, the tightness of NFL throwing windows, being able to diagnose much more advanced coverages, understanding the playbook, etc. One consistent thread is a defining trait that is both a curse and a strength: his ability to make plays off script, which has carried over from his Alabama days. For every miracle escape and razor-margin throw downfield like the 4th down play vs the Dolphins, you seem to have an inexcusable dropped fumble without even being touched (also see Dolphins game.) And the genesis of both is his underlying aggressiveness to make something happen with every snap, sometimes even when the play itself is simply unsalvageable. What often gets Young into trouble isn't an inability to execute a play, but his unwillingness to concede that the risk/reward ratio for a given decision simply isn't worth the attempt. There are few things that will drive a coach to putting a schematic leash on a player more quickly then when that player's outcomes become unpredictable, and even multiple miracle plays can be negated by a single colossal mistake. Where Bryce must find a balance is retaining the ability to conjure magic when needed, but to also keep his risk/reward instincts fully calibrated to what the team as a whole is comfortable with. No successful coach is entirely risk-averse, and many tend to be overly conservative in situations that decides the outcome of games, but "bad" Bryce sometimes emerges in situations where the only correct decision is to simply eat the ball and move on to the next play or next drive. If he can develop a better understanding of this flaw and work to overcome it without abandoning the traits that also make him special, he will take one step closer to becoming the player this franchise sacrificed so much for and redeeming that faith with the entire fanbase.
    • Is there a fifth option for welded shut and hermetically sealed?
×
×
  • Create New...