Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dareus on Sports Science


Swarly

Recommended Posts

Suh>>>>>>> Dareus. plus they already got there QB.

their QB has been injured more than half the time he's been in the league. besides, this thread isn't about QB's so I don't know why you guys are in here talking about offense and QB's.

and duh Suh is better than Dareus. Suh is a top 5 DT in the NFL after his first season no poo a rookie can't live up to that. Dareus may not be on his level but that's because Suh was a once in a generation prospect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

their QB has been injured more than half the time he's been in the league. besides, this thread isn't about QB's so I don't know why you guys are in here talking about offense and QB's.

and duh Suh is better than Dareus. Suh is a top 5 DT in the NFL after his first season no poo a rookie can't live up to that. Dareus may not be on his level but that's because Suh was a once in a generation prospect

Injury or not, they still took the chance on one. it was brought up because if they needed a QB last year, good chance they might have went after one.

and you were the one comparing the to DT's saying Dareus could have a Suh like impact on our defense. but so could Marvin Austin, Kenrick Ellis, Drake Nevis no one knows yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Injury or not, they still took the chance on one. it was brought up because if they needed a QB last year, good chance they might have went after one.

and you were the one comparing the to DT's saying Dareus could have a Suh like impact on our defense. but so could Marvin Austin, Kenrick Ellis, Drake Nevis no one knows yet.

No question that I am intrigued by Newton.

But the guy was more pro ready then Cam by a mile. If stafford was in this draft he would be the pick no question. (this is only if we didnt know he was so injury prone).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No question that I am intrigued by Newton.

But the guy was more pro ready then Cam by a mile. If stafford was in this draft he would be the pick no question. (this is only if we didnt know he was so injury prone).

true but i really was just saying we need a QB. now im to the point were il take anyone of them from Blaine, to Ryan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

can we try and keep this topic on how dominant Dareus is and how much he would help the Panthers instead of having another fuging "WE GOTTA GET A QB GUYS OR WE WILL SUCK FOREVER!" argument like 99% of the threads on this forum

think about it

line: Charles Johnson, Dareus, random, Hardy/Brown

LB: Anderson, Beason, Davis

CB: Gamble/random

SS/FS: Godfrey/Martin

plus it's super versatile.. if they wanted to do 3-4 occasionally we could have Dareus be the anchor and move Brown to 3-4 outside rusher(what many projected he would be) and bring in Connor...

so many possibilities

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously we need a qb but just drafting one because we can is not the right thing to do.

Anyways enough about freaking QBs.

were else are we going to get one from? i dont want anybody else trash(or overpaying) but every convo will end up talking about QBs. even when discussing your ava's ass, because Jimmy Clausen is ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He doesn't need to play in 2025. And maybe not 2026 either from what I've read. This is but one peer-reviewed selection:    "A devastating complication of returning to sport following ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a second ACL injury. Strong evidence now indicates that younger, more active athletes are at particularly high risk for a second ACL injury and this risk is greatest within the first two years following ACLR." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5226931/     Regarding your first question... "The optimal timing of ACLR is an important clinical decision that affects patient outcomes significantly. Even though there is no consensus in the literature, there are some trends regarding timing of ACLR. Various authors suggest that ACLR be performed at least 3 weeks after injury in order to avoid arthrofibrosis. More important than time alone, objective criteria including perioperative swelling, edema, hyperthermia, and ROM are important indicators of when surgery should be performed." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4004131/#:~:text=The optimal timing of ACLR is an important clinical decision,in order to avoid arthrofibrosis.  
    • Not sure I would be so sure they feel worse than us - their QB was better than Bryce at in the first season, they got DJ Moore, and 2 more high caliber draft picks.  We had to give up basically our entire defense this season indirectly to make that happen and we still have no true #1 WR.  Not saying I would rather have Caleb over Bryce at this point - but I would rather have their team situation and draft picks hands down.
    • A lot of people think this draft is weak at QB--I think, after the first five picks of the first round, there are a ton of developmental QBs who could develop into the role--here is the psychology behind it--Bryce becomes the mentor--you can learn as much by teaching others than by being taught.   It also makes him a true leader.  But I think there are a few QB in this draft that might not be ready now, but in 2 years, could be NFL starting QBs--Howard, Rourke, Ewers, Milroe, Dart, etc.  Talk about a cheaper backup and one that could evolve into trade capital--or if Bryce can't find consistency-his replacement.  Round 3 will have some of these qbs--maybe early day 3.
×
×
  • Create New...