To the muttonheads...

[Dpantherman]

thats a lot of PI

[Swarly]

this thread sucks

[Panthro]

thats a lot of PI

I'm not exactly Kate Moss

[TheRealDeal]

There has never been a worse post get so much pie

[Panthro]

Until now :)

[PantherDude]

My stand is we don't need to draft a QB this year, because I believe this year's QB class is extremely weak. There are other options. I say keep Moore, Clausen, and bring in a vet. We could see if Clausen is truly a bust. If Clausen plays well, we know we are set. If he plays bad, we readdress QB needs in next year's draft, which will probably be better...and we very well could be in contention for Luck. Not saying I want to throw away next season, but you have to look at the big picture and not settle for the smartest kid in the dumb class

Word. I don't want us to have a losing season to get Luck. I just prefer we get him when it fall on to us, not hoping we keep losing. Looking at our hard schedule, I don't think we will win a lot of games. I hope we do though.

[TheRealDeal]

There has never been a worse post get so much pie

Until now :)

Do you have trouble counting?

[Panthro]

My one pie was way more than your post deserved.

[TheRealDeal]

My post was infinitely better than yours.

You basically said "Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" and got pie from either the other whiners or the Cam d!ck riders.

Not shocking, it's like a big pie circle jerk with any of those people.

[Panthro]

Someone has pie envy

[koolkatluke]

Well actually if you look at it that way, even less people had him in the top 10.

Choose your stance already.

Link or a site or somthing to prove panthro is wrong please????

[TheRealDeal]

Well 32 teams passed on him so that should tell you something.

Others passed on him twice.

If we had actually done our homework on him, even more teams would have passed on him.

[PantherDude]

Someone has pie envy

Pie envy, you say?!?

[koolkatluke]

Sure I can prove I am right by you only showing that so far 3-4 people had him in their top 10 when at least 11 didn't have him in their top ten, I would say that's very few. Would you not?

Now I could go find everyone that said he wasn't going to be top 10 but what's the point of that? I may have exaggerated but this dude was trying to draw a comparison of Clausen to someone who was considered by 99% of people that matter as the #1 pick.

My point was to disprove the comparison. I may have exaggerated but the point stands.

This is what we are asking you. Panthro pulled up 3-4 site where jimmy was rated a top ten pick. You said you can pull up 11 that didn't. You haven't done what you say you could do even when ask. You have either came up with a lame excuse for not doing it or tried to change the disagreement all together.

This has nothing to do with when they were picked it is about what they were rated before the draft. You know this so please come up with more then where jimmy was picked to prove you're point. (like a site or a draft expert that had jimmy rated lower then a top ten pick) Or just admit you were wrong.