Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What a 9.0 Magnitude earthquake sounds like


blackcatgrowl

Recommended Posts

Welp, playing around with this using Audacity, I slowed it down from x16 speed to x4 speed. It's audible still, but not by much. Then I slowed it all the way down. There is maybe some increase in a really low rumble... but it's really hard to tell apart from background noise.

But keep in mind, that this sound crossed the pacific and then echoed around! And good lord... it goes on and on... never thought it took so long for two tectonic plates to slide around violently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a former submarine sonarman....

It would have been a continuous, very low rumble - elevated background noise. Since it would have been random, it definitely would not have been classified as anything. There isn't any narrowband to analyze, and of course the spread of the bearing of the sound would have immediately been known to have been fairly wide.

Back in the day we heard stuff like this (but not has long) often and classified it as geologics (as opposed to fish noises which were biologics).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a former submarine sonarman....

It would have been a continuous, very low rumble - elevated background noise. Since it would have been random, it definitely would not have been classified as anything. There isn't any narrowband to analyze, and of course the spread of the bearing of the sound would have immediately been known to have been fairly wide.

Back in the day we heard stuff like this (but not has long) often and classified it as geologics (as opposed to fish noises which were biologics).

You were a Jonesy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
    • At this range currently he’s probably a day 3 pick, but I think he will rise to day 2.
×
×
  • Create New...