Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

-Game of Thrones-HBO-


Kurb

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

For Jon, I would say the big mistake was after Rickon was dead, he lost it and charged the line by himself.  The plan they had might have worked, had he simply turned around and headed back to his lines with Rickon's body.  Between his stupid play, Sansa's foolish withholding of information, and Ramsay's failure to set any pickets to warn him if Snow held a few troops back and tried to flank him or some other force approached, none of them looked very smart in the end. 

But didn't he charge forward out of need? I mean Ramsay played it perfect no doubt.  But he got Snow to come out to Rickon and then he rained down a parade of arrows.....and Jon's charge IMO was to outrun the arrows and opt to go down swinging 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

But didn't he charge forward out of need? I mean Ramsay played it perfect no doubt.  But he got Snow to come out to Rickon and then he rained down a parade of arrows.....and Jon's charge IMO was to outrun the arrows and opt to go down swinging 

I think he charged forward out of anger and frustration.  Didn't he charge forward after he got to Rickon? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I think he charged forward out of anger and frustration.  Didn't he charge forward after he got to Rickon? 

Well he had to go after Rickon.  Then once he got to a dead Rickon...Ramsay launched an assault of arrows....and then Jon charged.   The Rickon play was masterful.  

Jon had to go, one he got out there and isolated, he had to make a move once the arrows launched (granted people we worried about him charging without the arrow assault)....so he charged ahead.  

Could argue his only option was to charge ahead....stay or retreat and the arrows impale him.  Ramsay played it well.  I just argue Snow basically made the right moves but and there was no way to win (if looking at Snow as an isolated person)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well he had to go after Rickon.  Then once he got to a dead Rickon...Ramsay launched an assault of arrows....and then Jon charged.   The Rickon play was masterful.  

Jon had to go, one he got out there and isolated, he had to make a move once the arrows launched (granted people we worried about him charging without the arrow assault)....so he charged ahead.  

Could argue his only option was to charge ahead....stay or retreat and the arrows impale him.  Ramsay played it well.  I just argue Snow basically made the right moves but and there was no way to win (if looking at Snow as an isolated person)

I would say that retreating was the better option.  Charging meant almost certain death unless his troops came up to support him, which throws their battle plans out of whack (which is exactly what happened).   And putting more distance between yourself and the shooter makes the shot more difficult, while decreasing range makes it easier.  And he was on horseback, so he would put himself out of range faster than on foot. 

 

Of course, they really did it for dramatic effect, and it achieved that goal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I think it was more likely she didn't know for certain LF was coming.  If she knew and withheld the information, then she was responsible for the deaths of a lot of troops fighting on the Stark side that might not have died if they had known the Knights of the Vale were coming and planned accordingly. 

This was my thought as well.  She was hoping that LF was coming, hence, let's wait a few more days, talk instead of lets wait till LF gets here with the knights.

I still think that she should have shared with Jon that she was asking The Vale for help, and that she had been promised his army if she needed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Link said:

It's pretty safe to assume that she didn't tell him. I mean, he flat out asked her who else was going to help them and she didn't say anything. So he went forward with the army they had.

Right, but he could have already known The Vale was contacted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is possible, if not likely, that LF and the Knights of the Vale arrived in the Winterfell area well in advance of the actual battle.  

They may have intentionally held back, remaining out of sight until the Stark and Bolton forces had inflicted significant damage on one other.  That strategy would help to maximize the chances of victory for LF's forces, while simultaneously minimizing the chance of significant losses.  It would also help to ensure his forces were the only "super power" remaining in the North.

Classic LF strategy.  Marrying Sansa to claim the North as his own is next thing on his to do list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I caught an early screening at a buddy's house. Believe some of what you read (if you like spoilers) but a lot is garbage.   I won't spoil a thing since it's a great episode 10.  Look forward to it again tonight on my own tv :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...