Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you believe QBs need to sit in order to be successful, you're basically a retard.


SmootsDaddy89

Recommended Posts

So, if the Jags take Mallet this year in the first they should bench Garrard?

I would let him sit for two years, then come in after he has learned how to be a pro.

Not at first. Garrard isn't Jimmy Clausen....he can play. If Mallett was drafted in the 1st round by the Jags then you would consider playing him late in the season pending the Garrard wasn't making a playoff run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Cassel is smoke and mirrors. Matt Cassell was also so bad at times before Brady blew his knee out that in garbage time he actually benched Cassel and would put Brady back in.

If Jimmy Clausen could run he probably wouldn't be that different than Cassel....other than the fact Cassell doesn't ignore the most talented guy on the field.

... and when such a talented guy is lining up with 2-3 rookie receivers and a rookie QB... neither does the defense. being the shortest receiver on the field doesn't help much either against double coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just looked it up.

Tom Brady's complete rookie season passing statistics:

1-of-3 passing, for six yards.

I believe all of these were from the Thanksgiving game.... unless I have the wrong year (grew up in Detroit watching Lions)

Tom Brady was a 6th round draft pick who was the 4th QB on the depth chart that year......he went to the Superbowl the next season. He doesn't really belong in his conversation......but you also can't argue he was sat and groomed to be the next QB like it some imply is ideal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. There isn't any benefit to keeping him on the bench for a few years, not knowing if he has what it takes to be their franchise guy. That's why I'm glad Clausen got so many starts.

Imagine how much more divided we'd be if Matt Moore started every game, sucked ass, and we still had the #1 overall pick, with no clue as to whether Jimmy could be our guy. What if we passed on QBs this year and next year only to find out Jimmy stinks in 2012 when we let Matt Moore go run a fruit stand?

That would suck.

Was Jimmy the first pick in the NFL draft. Nope. He was a second round QB, why do you think that he should be as good as Manning and Rivers right out of the gate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at first. Garrard isn't Jimmy Clausen....he can play. If Mallett was drafted in the 1st round by the Jags then you would consider playing him late in the season pending the Garrard wasn't making a playoff run.

Nope.

You said that 1st round QB's don't sit unless the QB ahead of him is a HOF or a Pro Bowler, and I disagree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... and when such a talented guy is lining up with 2-3 rookie receivers and a rookie QB... neither does the defense. being the shortest receiver on the field doesn't help much either against double coverage.

Steve Smith has never had trouble with double coveage pending the QB didn't go full retard. He had no trouble in 2010 in the brief moments Clausen was on the bench......zero trouble with Moore in 2009.....and zero trouble in 2008 when Jake was just bad instead of awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope.

You said that 1st round QB's don't sit unless the QB ahead of him is a HOF or a Pro Bowler, and I disagree.

I have never stated they should play week 1......I said they don't sit 2-3 yrs. I don't think Cam should start week 1. I think he should start mid to late season once ready for the reps.

Name QBs who sat 2-3 years drafted in the first round.....who weren't behind pro bowl or HOF QBs if you disagree with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Jimmy the first pick in the NFL draft. Nope. He was a second round QB, why do you think that he should be as good as Manning and Rivers right out of the gate?

Well, even though he was supposed to be a top ten pick, I don't.

However, if Josh Freeman can throw 10TDs in 10 starts, why can't Jimmy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something tells me this guy was expecting pie for this long ass post...nope... It wouldnt be a bad thing if we had the pleasure of letting Cam sit for a year and educate him before throwing him to the wolves. Growing pains happen on the side lines too. Keep him mentally healthy and confident. tons of sacks your rookie year will scare the skills and abililty right out of you...

That being said, we dont have the pleasure of letting him sit, unless he straight up gets beat by the veteran qb we bring in...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Jimmy the first pick in the NFL draft. Nope. He was a second round QB, why do you think that he should be as good as Manning and Rivers right out of the gate?

He was pro ready, he supposedly knew our playbook; he should of at least been able to move the ball down the field..he couldn't even do that. he even sucked in practice. he played so bad that it goes beyond the pieces around him. when we saw him throw the ball the way on 3rd and short or take a sack with no effort to escape were we all thinking "this guy is gonna be a star". Do you really want to see him back starting for the Panthers ever? Really? REALLY? I just don't see him having that high a ceiling right now..at best he's a decent backup 3 or 4 years from now..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...