Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Most Dangerous Offense in the NFL


ncmonzta

Recommended Posts

A more accurate Vince Young that isn't dumb as a fuging rock and doesn't have serious personality disorders? Yes please.

He's not that smart either....

His big red flags come from not having the intelligence to properly read defenses..among other things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Gettis/Lafell *Gross *Wharton *Kalil *Swhrartz *Otah *Shockey *Smith

*Newton

*Edwards *Williams/Stewart:D

All at the same time. How could you stop this?

simple, confused the rookie quarterback with your defense and force him into making a mistake. people act like Newton is going to come into the league as good as a Peyton Manning or Michael Vick, usually it takes time to develop a QB, trust me, if he starts too soon, i see struggles from Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marty Hurney said that since 1998, 9 QBs have been taken with the top pick in the draft. Only 4 have become consistent starters. THat is 44%. Players with Newton's skill set are even less successful. Players with Newton's character concerns are even less successful than that. In addition to that, Newton does not meet the 26-27-60 rule, and he is not considered a top QB prospect in any other year than this one. I would say that a 35% chance of success is generous. The odds are he WILL BUST. If you say he is worth the risk, break down the first pick (use the point chart) and see what the pick is actually worth. Worth the risk? Are you kidding me? Yes, he has potential and upside. So did the space shuttle that blew up over the coast of Florida 25 years ago. The problems are not on the outside, they are mechanical and internal.

Rebuttle: But in 14 games at Auburn.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marty Hurney said that since 1998, 9 QBs have been taken with the top pick in the draft. Only 4 have become consistent starters. THat is 44%. Players with Newton's skill set are even less successful. Players with Newton's character concerns are even less successful than that. In addition to that, Newton does not meet the 26-27-60 rule, and he is not considered a top QB prospect in any other year than this one. I would say that a 35% chance of success is generous. The odds are he WILL BUST. If you say he is worth the risk, break down the first pick (use the point chart) and see what the pick is actually worth. Worth the risk? Are you kidding me? Yes, he has potential and upside. So did the space shuttle that blew up over the coast of Florida 25 years ago. The problems are not on the outside, they are mechanical and internal.

Rebuttle: But in 14 games at Auburn.....

Racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Gettis/Lafell *Gross *Wharton *Kalil *Swhrartz *Otah *Shockey *Smith

*Newton

*Edwards *Williams/Stewart:D

All at the same time. How could you stop this?

Eight in the box all day. Disguise coverages and maybe blitz some too.

If I'm a DC looking across at a rookie QB, I'm smiling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

Marty Hurney said that since 1998, 9 QBs have been taken with the top pick in the draft. Only 4 have become consistent starters. THat is 44%. Players with Newton's skill set are even less successful. Players with Newton's character concerns are even less successful than that. In addition to that, Newton does not meet the 26-27-60 rule, and he is not considered a top QB prospect in any other year than this one. I would say that a 35% chance of success is generous. The odds are he WILL BUST. If you say he is worth the risk, break down the first pick (use the point chart) and see what the pick is actually worth. Worth the risk? Are you kidding me? Yes, he has potential and upside. So did the space shuttle that blew up over the coast of Florida 25 years ago. The problems are not on the outside, they are mechanical and internal.

Rebuttle: But in 14 games at Auburn.....

This isn't racist it is just stupid :lol:

Link to comment

Marty Hurney said that since 1998, 9 QBs have been taken with the top pick in the draft. Only 4 have become consistent starters. THat is 44%. Players with Newton's skill set are even less successful. Players with Newton's character concerns are even less successful than that. In addition to that, Newton does not meet the 26-27-60 rule, and he is not considered a top QB prospect in any other year than this one. I would say that a 35% chance of success is generous. The odds are he WILL BUST. If you say he is worth the risk, break down the first pick (use the point chart) and see what the pick is actually worth. Worth the risk? Are you kidding me? Yes, he has potential and upside. So did the space shuttle that blew up over the coast of Florida 25 years ago. The problems are not on the outside, they are mechanical and internal.

Rebuttle: But in 14 games at Auburn.....

A.) Players with Newton's skill set are even less successful.

Who had Newton's skill set?? Closest I can find at #1 is Mike Vick. He turned out pretty good.

B.) he is not considered a top QB prospect in any other year than this one.

Can you prove that. Seems to me like you are just saying random sh*t that is unquantifiable.

C.) I would say that a 35% chance of success is generous. The odds are he WILL BUST.

Again a perfectly unquantifiable random percentage that means absolutely nothing

D.) In addition to that, Newton does not meet the 26-27-60 rule

You are drooling to get your hands on Kellen Moore then huh?? LOL at people who rely on formulas to evaluate QBs. I'm sure you were prepared to pass on Luck as well; or does this formula only apply when we talk about Newton?

E.) Yes, he has potential and upside. So did the space shuttle that blew up over the coast of Florida 25 years ago. The problems are not on the outside, they are mechanical and internal.

Comparing drafting a football player to a national tragedy is in bad, bad taste. To make it worse the analogy makes no fugging sense.

:nonod:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...