Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I do not want Newton, Do you?


Ashor

Recommended Posts

Teeray- Get in here and prove your fandom bro! Quick who was responsible for the hit that caused Chris Simms to have his Spleen removed? Who was the starting DT in '05 along with Brentson Buckner?

Al Wallace and Jordan Carstens:reddevil:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So back to my original point. Why are you using random stats from 2009 okay but people analyzing Cam's last 6 games stupid and cherry picking??

I used that data because the post I was responding to directly chose those 5 games as the period of discussion, which is what I told you a few posts ago. I didn't arbitrarily choose those games, I simply responded to the post from the other fellow (too lazy to search but since you quoted it look a few posts above mine in that thread and you'll find it).

In that same thread, you tried to claim that during that stretch, his yards per completion wasn't very good, when in fact it was second best in the league.

I'm going to say it again but I'm going to seperate it from the rest of the post so maybe you will comprehend, but I doubt it:

The other poster claimed that during the 5 game stretch, Moore only played well because we averaged over 200 yards per game on the ground to which I responded with the stats of our RBs (plus/minus 3% for RB) during that 5 game stretch to show that we didn't average over 200 ypg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used that data because the post I was responding to directly chose those 5 games as the period of discussion, which is what I told you a few posts ago. I didn't arbitrarily choose those games, I simply responded to the post from the other fellow (too lazy to search but since you quoted it look a few posts above mine in that thread and you'll find it).

In that same thread, you tried to claim that during that stretch, his yards per completion wasn't very good, when in fact it was second best in the league.

I'm going to say it again but I'm going to seperate it from the rest of the post so maybe you will comprehend, but I doubt it:

The other poster claimed that during the 5 game stretch, Moore only played well because we averaged over 200 yards per game on the ground to which I responded with the stats of our RBs (plus/minus 3% for RB) during that 5 game stretch to show that we didn't average over 200 ypg.

I don't know what's more funnier, you arguing Moore's case or Teeray entertaining the poo. I was a fan of MM, but he is so 2009 it ain't even funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used that data because the post I was responding to directly chose those 5 games as the period of discussion, which is what I told you a few posts ago. I didn't arbitrarily choose those games, I simply responded to the post from the other fellow (too lazy to search but since you quoted it look a few posts above mine in that thread and you'll find it).

In that same thread, you tried to claim that during that stretch, his yards per completion wasn't very good, when in fact it was second best in the league.

I'm going to say it again but I'm going to seperate it from the rest of the post so maybe you will comprehend, but I doubt it:

The other poster claimed that during the 5 game stretch, Moore only played well because we averaged over 200 yards per game on the ground to which I responded with the stats of our RBs (plus/minus 3% for RB) during that 5 game stretch to show that we didn't average over 200 ypg.

Actually if you go back and read the thread you were desperately trying to make your point by continuously referring to those games over and over again when everybody else was talking about his performance overall.

Then another poster mentioned that during your cherry picked games that the running game was going really strong and you refuted it.

The only reason those 5 games were a part of the discussion is because YOU brought them up. :lol: Thank you for referring me back to prove my own point :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...