How many people...

[TheRealDeal]

Gotcha

[Peppers90 NC]

In all of this, I've yet to see a reasonable argument against taking him.

There are other talented players that will obviously transition well to the NFL. Cam is 50/50, he could be the best player in the draft or one of the worst. There, simple, easy to understand. We all have our own opinions, thats it. Half think he will be and the other half have their doubts.

[teeray]

There are other talented players that will obviously transition well to the NFL. Cam is 50/50, he could be the best player in the draft or one of the worst. There, simple, easy to understand. We all have our own opinions, thats it. Half think he will be and the other half have their doubts.

Cam is 50/50 but both of us know there is only a 10% chance of that.

[TheRealDeal]

90% chance fail?

[Matt Moore]

aaand this thread is now about newton

who saw that one coming?

[TheRealDeal]

I keed

[Peppers90 NC]

Cam is 50/50 but both of us know there is only a 10% chance of that.

thats what you get out of that perfectly easy to comprehend explanation? Bet: you will still ask people why they have preferences other than a QB at #1, actually you will turn that into, why do you hate cam newton.

[teeray]

thats what you get out of that perfectly easy to comprehend explanation? Bet: you will still ask people why they have preferences other than a QB at #1, actually you will turn that into, why do you hate cam newton.

Yeah but why do you hate Cam Newton??

Hint: what I said is from a movie and was a joke.

[blackcatgrowl]

Gotcha

Not really. No one is 100% a sure fire pick. I've never said Newton was. And I STILL don't see his footwork issues as a big enough concern to warrant not taking him.

I think the honest to god problem here, is that everyone on the Anti-Cam train expects a Peyton Manning for a #1 overall QB.

The reality of it, is that Peyton Manning is like a once in a decade, or even once in a generation type pick. And even at that, despite his accolades and successes in the NFL, there are people which talk poo about Peyton Manning to this day.

[teeray]

aaand this thread is now about newton

who saw that one coming?

:rofl: damnit!! Who can protect us from ourselves!!! :rofl:

[mav1234]

I don't expect Peyton Manning.

I'd settle for Sam Bradford, frankly.

but each prospect is different, so I'm cool with it if we go with a QB. Frankly, I just think the risk with these guys way outweighs our need for a QB. That's jut my opinion, though.

[TheRealDeal]

Not really. No one is 100% a sure fire pick. I've never said Newton was. And I STILL don't see his footwork issues as a big enough concern to warrant not taking him.

I think the honest to god problem here, is that everyone on the Anti-Cam train expects a Peyton Manning for a #1 overall QB.

The reality of it, is that Peyton Manning is like a once in a decade, or even once in a generation type pick. And even at that, despite his accolades and successes in the NFL, there are people which talk poo about Peyton Manning to this day.

Nope, that's not it

[blackcatgrowl]

I don't expect Peyton Manning.

I'd settle for Sam Bradford, frankly.

That's easy to say now that Luck is out of the picture. Cause everyone was saying Luck was the next Manning... even though this isn't entirely true.

[blackcatgrowl]

Nope, that's not it

Ok, let me rephrase it... the Anti-Cammers who are against him for "Football" reasons ALONE.