Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The debate is Cam vs. Not Cam, not Cam vs. Player X


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Anybody else find it interesting that the anti-Cam crowd has been unable to rally around a player to challenge Cam for the #1 pick spot? All they do is bitch and moan about how picking Cam will be the end of the world, but every alternative player they trot out is quickly crushed and laughed and booed off the stage. Nobody's gained any traction at all throughout the whole process because of how bad the arguments have been for actually drafting someone else.

Any anti-Cammer want to try and explain why you guys haven't been able to come up with an alternative player other than the non-existent NotCam that can't be drafted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry kiddo, having Blaine Gabbert in your avatar doesn't mean that the majority of the anti-Cammers want him. The very next post after yours randomly lists Dareus for example.

Okay, I am going to go find a couple hundred posts from "Cam haters" that would prefer Gabbert.

Want me to also find the posts for Dareus, Fairley, Green, and Peterson?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have thought that you guys would have settled on AJ Green seeing as how most draft analysts consider him to be the best overall player available. That would have your two camps of Most Important Need Position (Newton) and BPA (Green) facing off against each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the first I've seen of that thread and I'm here everyday. And there have been other threads showing an equal mix of the non-Cam choices. Heck, take a look at the guys in this thread claiming Gabbert is easily the #1 alternative they want lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's sort of funny you guys were so bad with 3s tonight about the same time Silver and LeBron both say the game is broken due to too many 3 attempts. The NBA is almost unwatchable. No defense, refs call fouls for almost anything, guys care more about looking pretty on the court than playing tough, etc. Today's NBA is putrid.
    • It's gotten more complicated with the change of CBS and FOX no longer being exclusive AFC/NFC partners From a home team perspective, the NFL requires the home market (which is typically the broadcast reach of the station airing the game) to carry the game. For times where there is a conflict (let's say, FOX Charlotte is airing some major news event) then the broadcast will go to a local station that FOX Charlotte has an arrangement with -- like the CW, maybe.  Only in super-rare instances would local FOX throw the game over to a major competitor like to WSOC/ABC. But it could happen This is how games that are "exclusive" to streaming will end up being broadcast by a local channel in those home team markets -- because the NFL wants the local market to be able to see the game.  Amazon TNF games will always be available on some local channel in those teams' markets, for example. Or the upcoming Netflix games For TV markets that do not have a local team, then the local station gets to choose from what's available. Ideally, they'd choose a regional game or one that is close in the conference.  In Atlanta, for example, we would typically get one of the NFC South matchups for times when the Falcons aren't playing.  
×
×
  • Create New...