Whisenhunt: No one in this draft stands out like Sam Bradford

[eViL jEsTeR]

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/03/31/whisenhunt-no-one-stands-out-like-sam-bradford/

Practically the only the thing the national media agrees on is that the Cardinals are likely to take Blaine Gabbert if he’s available at No. 5.

Does this mean they WOULDN'T take Newton if he's available at 5? Does that mean he values Gabbert over Newton?

[Lout]

Makes me think that Whisenhunt indeed does like Gabbert. Because if he didn't like Gabbert, he would have made people continue to believe that he actually did like Gabbert.

[panthers55]

You would think he would be happy that no one is head and shoulders above the other, That way he is just as likely to get his franchise guy standing at 5 then we would be at 1.

[CharlotteBeer.com]

Makes me think that Whisenhunt indeed does like Gabbert. Because if he didn't like Gabbert, he would have made people continue to believe that he actually did like Gabbert.

I believe the word you're looking for is smokescreen.

[Jangler]

Warren Moon is pissed.

[CRA]

Bradford was a spread QB, coming off an injured throwing shoulder, and a year off of football........

and many argued Clausen was better.

:rolleyes:

[Lout]

I believe the word you're looking for is smokescreen.

Lol. You said it.

[TheRealDeal]

Another racist exposed

[CarolinaVeins]

Bradford was a spread QB, coming off an injured throwing shoulder, and a year off of football........

and many argued Clausen was better.

:rolleyes:

Exactly

[Mr. Scot]

He's saying this year's quarterback crop isn't very good (and he's right).

Still won't be surprised if he takes the best one available when their spot comes up.

[mav1234]

We took our entire ownership to see Gabbert in an interview, our offensive coaches can't shut up about him to the press, we've been linked six ways to sunday to him, but we really, really do not think he's Sam Bradford. Hear us, everyone above us? HES NO SAM BRADFORD!!

well, he's not, but still. Kinda amusing to me.

[eViL jEsTeR]

Suppose Gabbert and Newton are gone.... Will they still go QB? I don't think they'd use their #5 pick on the 3rd best QB. I think at that point they would wait until the 2nd or use their second to trade back into the late first. (I'm assuming they have a high second, I haven't checked.)

[Mr. Scot]

Suppose Gabbert and Newton are gone.... Will they still go QB? I don't think they'd use their #5 pick on the 3rd best QB. I think at that point they would wait until the 2nd or use their second to trade back into the late first. (I'm assuming they have a high second, I haven't checked.)

Mallett or Locker maybe. Hard to say.

[mav1234]

I can't see them going for the third best QB. They have other holes than QB.