Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pros and Cons of Starting Rookie QBs


CarolinaVeins

Recommended Posts

Warren Sapp said that as a defender, the thought of facing a rookie QB had him salivating (he's against it).

Jeff Saturday said he was for it. However, Rich Eisen pointed out to Saturday that the only QB he's ever worked with is Peyton Manning, so his view might be a little skewed.

Eisen asked about the lockout affecting the ability of teams to work with new QBs. Saturday said they'll get a playbook one way or the other, rules or no rules (I agree on this point).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saturday was pretty funny in that video. For that that haven't/won't watch it Saturday says he thinks (stutters and sounds like he almost said "hopes") Carolina will take Newton. If he was thinking "hopes" the question I have is whether that's the UNC alumni speaking hoping for the best for the team, or is it the player for another NFL team speaking hoping for the worst for the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Summary please... Me fone no play de videos.

Warren states that rookie QBs should wait and learn before starting. Jeff states that it shouldnt matter because when you put them on the field their newbies anway. Towards the end they bring up the lockout and Jeff says dont be surprised if QB prospects get playbooks. He mentions Newton for example

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I havent heard that. Is there an article or video link?

He's said it a few times, generally when talking about Clausen.

Might have said it in his initial presser, but I don't remember for sure. Pretty sure it came up in his first interview on WFNZ.

(don't have links handy, but you might find them on forum backpages)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't have to be an either/or thing. Say you have a rookie learning under a vet starter. Train the rookie up on a couple of packages where they can get a series in every now and then. Get them used to the speed of the game, while still having them spend most of their time watching and learning how to be a pro.

Once the rookie starts to catch on, you can begin to think about a larger role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's turned into quite a gunslinger
    • Hey guys, remember when we won those meaningless games in 2010 and it cost us the #1 pick and the chance to draft Cam? Oh.... right I get that's more of an extreme example because it got us a HOF caliber QB.  But it's the general concept, you want to win late season games when you have the pieces in place to make a run the next season, we currently are not in that place. Herbert and Sewell are the ones I point to so much, because we literally lost out on 2 franchise different makers by 1 draft slot.  Give us those two players while we still have CMC, Moore, and the rest of the picks we gave up for Bryce, and we'd have been a legit playoff contender the last few years. Draft position matters in the NFL more than any other sport (other than the #1 pick in the NBA in a year with a generational talent).
    • It’s so crazy. If we had a shot for pick 1 and there was some generational player there then yeah maybe I could get behind the draft position argument. I’d say most GMs and coaches aren’t diving into the draft right now. They are trying to win games. 
×
×
  • Create New...