Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Match.com.....Opinions?


boo7382

Recommended Posts

hmmm well, so far its about half and half.....had a few people message me...not really anyone stood out

Did a couple searches including keywords "Carolina Panthers"....didn't yield much

If this doesn't work....Ill go on match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a firm believer in "You get what you pay for"

If you want guys who are somewhat serious about dating then $$$ Sites are your ticket. The freesites have mostly carnies, midgets, and mermen.

Does this mean I could possibly

a. smell like cabbage

b. find someone relatively close to my height, or

c. live under the sea?!

:ihih:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boo you can come to my wedding in July in SD. There will be a wide variety of single men there for you to choose from. Some athletes, some service men, some stoners, some corporate guys, some students, etc. There will be different forms of athletes, different age ranges, different levels of success.

For those that think that post looks like the ghey, there will also be females attending but I'm not sure if Boo is into that :)

The only problem is there might be an Atl Falcon there so I'm trying to get someone else to come to offset his terribleness. If you can look past that minor indiscretion, you will have a good time and meet someone awesome.

And if not then you get to be in SD for the biggest weekend of the year, 4th of July weekend!

Struggling to fill up your quota of invites?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant remember if it was Eharmony or Match but my ex lives in NYC and said one of his friends was on the commercial where it was supposed to be a "real" date....

Either way, I guess the commercial doesn't matter as long as it works.

Eharmony commercials are about who got married. Match.com commercials are about first dates. I think.

With Eharmony, I felt that the responses I got were canned and suspected they were planted. They all read about the same ... Match was more the meat market ... married men looking for one-night stands was what I mostly got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...