Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFLPA Said --VS--NFL/Owners Said


Kurb

Recommended Posts

Here we go:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/03/14/april-6-hearing-date-gives-nfl-players-time-to-talk/related/

"It doesn’t foreclose the players from filing a motion to transfer the case from Judge Nelson to Judge David Doty. Though neither we nor NFL general counsel Jeff Pash (one of the guests on today’s supersized PFT Live) are currently aware of any precedent that would allow a case to be transferred within the same district based on a given judge’s knowledge of the process, nothing stops the players from trying.

That said, the players don’t seem to be concerned about Judge Nelson’s handling of the case. “That’s not an issue,” Saints quarterback Drew Brees said during a Monday conference call arranged by the NFLPA*. “That’s something that the owners seem to be very focused on. For us it about the facts and the law.”

The fact that Judge Nelson was nominated by President Obama and appointed by a Congress controlled by Democrats is another reason for the players to not be complaining."

It's funny how "facts and law" have nothing to do when some judges get to exercise their power over others. I do have more confidence a that a conservative judge would A LITTLE more fair, than liberal. I can predict right now the players will get everything they want (and then some).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that. I'm just saying IMO the owners are partially to blame as well. I think by giving the players so much in the last deal, the current situation was bound to happen.

True, but sadly, I believe they had about as much choice then, as they do now...:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but sadly, I believe they had about as much choice then, as they do now...:rolleyes:

That very well could be true. I don't know much about how it happened last time, but I would think it would have been easier to negotiate back then (before giving so much to the players) than it is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Owners know that the judge doty will (and has always) ruled in the players favor. Nothing will be different with Nelson (it at least appears by her background). They (owners) where trapped then and they are trapped now. They will have to push this up to higher courts, in hopes of getting at least a fair shake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That very well could be true. I don't know much about how it happened last time, but I would think it would have been easier to negotiate back then (before giving so much to the players) than it is now.

It happened because Tagliabue was planning on retiring and wanted to keep his legacy of labor peace intact. Not to absolve the owners of any blame, they did vote for it. But, Tagliabue sold them on a sh*t deal to protect his reputation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree to an extent. I just look at it like this. If you have a child and spoil them giving them everything, then suddently give them less what will happen? They will throw a tantrum until they get their way. The players like the spoiled child throwing a tantrum. I still fault the parent (owners) as well for spoiling the child. I understand your frustration towards the players. I just feel like the owners are also at fault for setting up the situation.

As a parent....I will buy that analogy.

However, you still have to put your foot down and show them who is boss....and that is what the owners are doing to these spoiled little bitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we go:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/03/14/april-6-hearing-date-gives-nfl-players-time-to-talk/related/

"It doesn’t foreclose the players from filing a motion to transfer the case from Judge Nelson to Judge David Doty. Though neither we nor NFL general counsel Jeff Pash (one of the guests on today’s supersized PFT Live) are currently aware of any precedent that would allow a case to be transferred within the same district based on a given judge’s knowledge of the process, nothing stops the players from trying.

That said, the players don’t seem to be concerned about Judge Nelson’s handling of the case. “That’s not an issue,” Saints quarterback Drew Brees said during a Monday conference call arranged by the NFLPA*. “That’s something that the owners seem to be very focused on. For us it about the facts and the law.”

The fact that Judge Nelson was nominated by President Obama and appointed by a Congress controlled by Democrats is another reason for the players to not be complaining."

It's funny how "facts and law" have nothing to do when some judges get to exercise their power over others. I do have more confidence a that a conservative judge would A LITTLE more fair, than liberal. I can predict right now the players will get everything they want (and then some).

And then the owners will appeal.

This is not going to be settled quickly in court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...