Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Perspective on Blaine Gabbert


davos

Recommended Posts

Blaine Gabbert sounds like a quirky nfl name that can work. Cam newton has a better feel to it but it may be too normal and fall short. Gabbert is such a crazy soundiing name it might work.

I take it Kaepernick is over the top?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is this "open mind" you speak of? I've heard of such things whispered in back alleys, but I was assured no such thing existed in this land of the Huddle.:eek:

Really. I come here to express an opinion but to refine my thinking as well. Some intellectuals on here post things like, "Won't happen." and that is it, as if they are the ray of truth and wisdom we all lack. People get fixed on a player and it becomes their religion, their political party. They see this as a soapbox to force their views on others and condemning those who do not agree.

I have been attacked personally because I argue, "You just do not want that much risk" or "It is too early to tell." Not being able to see other perspectives and developing hate because your opinion is not accepted as doctrine is plain old stupidity. It is at the core of divorces, racism, every war, and nearly every form of abuse. However, mental midgets (oops, a slur) have the right to own a computer and internet is cheap. Give them a username that can be changed and the courage anonymity brings them, they become cyber warriors, defending close-minded ignorance with an unbridled passion.

The end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you see that says he won't be?

The Nebraska and Texas Tech games. I know it isn't fair to judge a guy off of only two games. But he went willy nilly :willy_nilly: those two games when he was dealing with pressure.

This guy to me, and Mike Mayock (who is infinitely more qualified) disagrees with me on this, is a total lack of pocket presence. Any QB struggles when under pressure. But sometimes he panicked even when he wasn't under pressure he just thought he was.

I think he has a lot of tools to be a REALLY good QB. But, and this is just my opinion, he has David Carr written all over him.

Carr also was very effective when he was comfortable and could throw without pressure. Unfortunately, that NEVER happens in the NFL. You always feel pressured. And to me, how Gabbert deals with that will determine just how good he will be. Because he has the arm and smarts to be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

What do you see that says he won't be?

The Nebraska and Texas Tech games. I know it isn't fair to judge a guy off of only two games. But he went willy nilly :willy_nilly: those two games when he was dealing with pressure.

This guy to me, and Mike Mayock (who is infinitely more qualified) disagrees with me on this, is a total lack of pocket presence. Any QB struggles when under pressure. But sometimes he panicked even when he wasn't under pressure he just thought he was.

I think he has a lot of tools to be a REALLY good QB. But, and this is just my opinion, he has David Carr written all over him.

Carr also was very effective when he was comfortable and could throw without pressure. Unfortunately, that NEVER happens in the NFL. You always feel pressured. And to me, how Gabbert deals with that will determine just how good he will be. Because he has the arm and smarts to be great.

Link to comment

The Nebraska and Texas Tech games. I know it isn't fair to judge a guy off of only two games. But he went willy nilly :willy_nilly: those two games when he was dealing with pressure.

This guy to me, and Mike Mayock (who is infinitely more qualified) disagrees with me on this, is a total lack of pocket presence. Any QB struggles when under pressure. But sometimes he panicked even when he wasn't under pressure he just thought he was.

I think he has a lot of tools to be a REALLY good QB. But, and this is just my opinion, he has David Carr written all over him.

Carr also was very effective when he was comfortable and could throw without pressure. Unfortunately, that NEVER happens in the NFL. You always feel pressured. And to me, how Gabbert deals with that will determine just how good he will be. Because he has the arm and smarts to be great.

I saw him playing Illinois, I think, and I got the same impression. Happy feet. His line was not good, but he was getting pressure on the edge and would not step up into the pocket. He ran from it. This can be fixed, but happy feet and no pocket presence=short NFL career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Nebraska and Texas Tech games. I know it isn't fair to judge a guy off of only two games. But he went willy nilly :willy_nilly: those two games when he was dealing with pressure.

This guy to me, and Mike Mayock (who is infinitely more qualified) disagrees with me on this, is a total lack of pocket presence. Any QB struggles when under pressure. But sometimes he panicked even when he wasn't under pressure he just thought he was.

I think he has a lot of tools to be a REALLY good QB. But, and this is just my opinion, he has David Carr written all over him.

Carr also was very effective when he was comfortable and could throw without pressure. Unfortunately, that NEVER happens in the NFL. You always feel pressured. And to me, how Gabbert deals with that will determine just how good he will be. Because he has the arm and smarts to be great.

Whoa. Deja vu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even know how to pronounce it. Is it supposed to be like "Caper nick"? I just call him Pumpernickel because he reminds me of the bread you get at Outback...

:willy_nilly:

I think you are all over the pronunciation. As for developmental QBs, why not? He is a poor man's Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Nebraska and Texas Tech games. I know it isn't fair to judge a guy off of only two games. But he went willy nilly :willy_nilly: those two games when he was dealing with pressure.

This guy to me, and Mike Mayock (who is infinitely more qualified) disagrees with me on this, is a total lack of pocket presence. Any QB struggles when under pressure. But sometimes he panicked even when he wasn't under pressure he just thought he was.

I think he has a lot of tools to be a REALLY good QB. But, and this is just my opinion, he has David Carr written all over him.

Carr also was very effective when he was comfortable and could throw without pressure. Unfortunately, that NEVER happens in the NFL. You always feel pressured. And to me, how Gabbert deals with that will determine just how good he will be. Because he has the arm and smarts to be great.

Lies!!!!! Lies I tell ya! A GOD is never under Teh pressure!!!11!!1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those two games mentioned look pretty abysmal for a college QB:

Nebraska: 18-42 (42.9%) 199 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT

Texas Tech: 12-30 (40.0%) 90 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT

Not that it means anything, but Texas Tech runs nearly a carbon copy offense to that of Missouri & Nebraska was the school Gabbert de-committed to. Both teams had something to play for and it gave him the shakes. The bowl game which was actually a loss to Stanzi & Iowa (America!) saved his spot in the draft imo which actually wasn't that spectacular.

He's a really interesting prospect for me because if you look at HS, people thought he was hands down the best pro-style QB (Luck was actually in these rankings). And again this whole Stitzell thing that he's been working on since high school keeps me very optimistic. If he is committed, are happy feet someone can overcome a year in a learning type role?

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/recruiting/rankings/rank-1818

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...