Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone else think this Charlie Sheen thing is just a publicity stunt?

Awesomeness!!

By Awesomeness!!,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

boo7382 Newbie

boo7382

Posted
Posted

I can't say I'm sick of hearing about it, I just honestly don't care. I'm immune to publicity stunts and hype.

I still haven't seen Avatar

I hate Lady Gaga

I don't have, and don't particularly care to own, an iPhone or and iPad

Until recently, I thought Justin Bieber was a recurring character on SNL (there's no way those music videos aren't supposed to be funny. They're better than Samberg's)

I don't watch Glee (and don't think that girl is hot, either. She's got a jawline like Russel Brand)

I have no Idea what the whole "I'm with CoCo" thing was about

And lately I've completely ignored what's going on with Charlie Sheen. To be honest, I thought he was still married to Denise Richards.

The last media blitz I actually paid attention to was Michael Jackson's death.

Avatar was only good in the Imax 3D

I also hate Lady Gaga

Get a droid, theyre better

Never seen a Bieber video, but I know who he is by just watching the news

Dont watch glee

Im with CoCo was Conan- all over TBS

Sheen is also all over the news

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Veteran

Captroop

Posted
Posted

Avatar was only good in the Imax 3D

I also hate Lady Gaga

Get a droid, theyre better

Never seen a Bieber video, but I know who he is by just watching the news

Dont watch glee

Im with CoCo was Conan- all over TBS

Sheen is also all over the news

I wouldn't get my news from any source that spent any amount of time talking about Bieber or Charlie Sheen.

NPR FTW!

And I am strongly considering a droid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
boo7382 Newbie

boo7382

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't get my news from any source that spent any amount of time talking about Bieber or Charlie Sheen.

NPR FTW!

And I am strongly considering a droid.

Id rather chew my arm off than listen to NPR. Talk about nap time!

They were talking about it on the news b/c they just recently sold Bieber's hair on Ebay or something and it went for like 40,000. Yes, that is what our society has come to. I dont care that its being donated to charity, someone still payed 40,000 for it.

Yes, droids are the shizz

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthro Collaborator

Panthro

Posted
Posted

I wouldn't get my news from any source that spent any amount of time talking about Bieber or Charlie Sheen.

NPR FTW!

And I am strongly considering a droid.

I prefer to get my news with an accent. Makes me feel elitist as a drive around in my POS car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Veteran

Captroop

Posted
Posted

I prefer to get my news with an accent. Makes me feel elitist as a drive around in my POS car.

This. Kojo Nnamdi!

But listening to real news is great, even if it's boring. It literally pays off. For example. When the Libya thing first started, NPR was talking about how Libya was one of America's leading oil producers, and any crisis there would cause an oil spike. So I went and bought a full tank of gas at $2.97/gal, the next day, I shiz you not, gas was $3.30/gal. Saved me $4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Johnny Rockets Rookie

Johnny Rockets

Posted
Posted

The only reason people care is because worrying about the other things going on in the world (i.e. Libya, etc.) Would require actual thought, which is a scarcity these days.

I think too much at work so I reward myself with 30 minutes of watching TMZ in the afternoon to dumb myself down a bit. What's weird is that shortly after that I am watching ABC World News tonight. Then I go take care of my business on the thrown while reading InTouch Weekly magazine. My days are a mental roller coaster of contradiction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Veteran

Captroop

Posted
Posted

I think too much at work so I reward myself with 30 minutes of watching TMZ in the afternoon to dumb myself down a bit. What's weird is that shortly after that I am watching ABC World News tonight. Then I go take care of my business on the thrown while reading InTouch Weekly magazine. My days are a mental roller coaster of contradiction.

Wow. Before now I had you ranked in the upper enchilada of intellects on this site. I cannot describe in words how much I have a distaste for TMZ. In part because I hate this whole celebrity worship thing that TMZ has promulgated. It's part of the reason why more kids today would rather be the personal assistant to a celebrity than the CEO of a Fortune 500 (as recent studies indicate).

But mainly because they knocked The Simpsons off Fox's daily after-work boradcast. I want to see Stonecutters! Not who might have a baby bump or who went grocery shopping today! Fug TMZ and all those who watch it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • Carolina Mike
      2024 College Football Thread

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...