Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your on the clock


shaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

In the words of the great Kevin Costner...

Tetairoa McMillan no matter what

I thought he said, "Dad, do you want to have a catch?"  I need to rewatch it.  He could have said, "Dad, do you think we should draft Tetairoa McMillan?" now that I think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I am more intrigued by Milroe.  You have to re-define the QB position, but dang he can move.  Richardson was intriguing at the time, but in my view, you don't take a QB based on intrigue--you see promise and fit.  But desperate teams take desperate gambles.  

I read a post on another team's discussion board and somebody said that it is possible that Milroe and Dart go before Sanders.  I don't think that--I think Sanders is a good QB who needs to sit--Pittsburgh would be a good fit for him--but if so, I do not envy Mike Tomlin for the 2026 year.  Can you imagine having the biggest Ego in the NFL as your QB while the son of the biggest ego in the NFL all time is the backup?  Imagine the Steelers lose 2-3 games and Rodgers is not good--it would be a circus, imo.

I agree. Intriguing gets a long look at it but it's not enough and teams have to let it go as what it is vs wasting a pick. He just never pulled enough positives together to clear his negatives.

I agree about Dart and Milroe. I think they go higher then normal but they weren't overhyped to the level Sanders was. It only takes one team tho and QBs make people lose their minds right before their jobs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bandu said:

probably not i think MG might even be WR 1 on some big boards .to me he looks like the best WR in this draft class 

He is the best WR in the draft IMO. I also think you can get similar players in later rounds...

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, shaq said:

It’s pick 8, nobody is trying to trade up and you’re forced to make a pick. 

The board has fallen like this:

#1- Cam Ward

#2- Travis Hunter

#3- Abdul Carter

#4- Will Campbell

#5- Ashton Jeanty 

#6- Mason Graham 

#7- Armand Membou

Who do you draft and why?

Tyler Warren. We drafted a mini-Mahomes in 2023. He needs his normal sized replica of Kelci. Defensive talent is to be had later in the draft and I think he is the only true Blue Chip left at that point. 
 

BPA. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Better throw Mason Graham and Walter Nolan in the mix. Maybe even McMillan and Membou in that group as will. They have interest in all of them

Yea but in the mock provided in the OP Graham + Membou were gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look for guys who are productive but also physical mismatches  who can't be replaced later in the draft. If we pass on Warren who could be our next Greg Olsen and actually mentored by the same, for a tweener who we have to fit  into a role, we will have made a big mistake. Warren is a pretty sure thing and limits the need for a number 1 wr. Then again I wanted Olsen when he was drafted and they never listen to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm taking Warren. 

I'm not letting need twist my arm in the top 10

We had the 32nd ranked rush D last year.  I'm not solving a lot of DL issues drafting a small undersized edge player that is just an okay pass rusher.  That's more than likely a project.  I want on field help out of my top 10 pick.  Draft front 7 in rounds 2 and 3 and find a vet to bring in for short term help.   Not a huge gap IMO in terms of front 7 prospects in the first and second rounds. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I look for guys who are productive but also physical mismatches  who can't be replaced later in the draft. If we pass on Warren who could be our next Greg Olsen and actually mentored by the same, for a tweener who we have to fit  into a role, we will have made a big mistake. Warren is a pretty sure thing and limits the need for a number 1 wr. Then again I wanted Olsen when he was drafted and they never listen to me.

feels like last time panthers55 and I agreed on something was 2012 when we advocated for Luke.  100% certain that Warren must be the pick now! Overall the board didn't want Luke then either. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...