Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My one and only mock draft


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Bech or Noel---I think they also like Trapilo (OT) from BC.  I hope they grab a T, personally, but with BC, they may not feel a sense of urgency

I don't think they have an OT under contract next year so they need to find a sense of urgency IMO. Leaning onto BC, who no team wanted this year on a real contract, at this point is a mystery to me. So many coaches have passed him over in his 5 years. So yeah take an OT and hole they can become a solid backup at least

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't know, that workout warrior who never had more than a sack and a half in a season and put up the tackle numbers of a rotational two down NT seems like a guy most people should vehemently not want with a top 10 pick.

Well I know you don't want him, that isn't news haha

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I don't think they have an OT under contract next year so they need to find a sense of urgency IMO. Leaning onto BC, who no team wanted this year on a real contract, at this point is a mystery to me. So many coaches have passed him over in his 5 years. So yeah take an OT and hole they can become a solid backup at least

I do think that if there's a massive curveball thrown at #8 it's an OT. There's a lot of smoke signaling that OT is probably a lot higher on our need list than most fans would expect. We look fine on paper this year but after this year it's super cloudy and taking an OT at #8 would probably open the door to trading Moton now.

I mean, look at a team like the Bengals. Joe Burrow has been taking an unholy beating. If I'm them I'd send us a 2nd rounder for Moton without a second thought because they're shortening Burrow's career behind these OLs.

I almost expect an OT to be taken by us somewhere in the first three rounds.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I do think that if there's a massive curveball thrown at #8 it's an OT. There's a lot of smoke signaling that OT is probably a lot higher on our need list than most fans would expect. We look fine on paper this year but after this year it's super cloudy and taking an OT at #8 would probably open the door to trading Moton now.

I mean, look at a team like the Bengals. Joe Burrow has been taking an unholy beating. If I'm them I'd send us a 2nd rounder for Moton without a second thought because they're shortening Burrow's career behind these OLs.

I almost expect an OT to be taken by us somewhere in the first three rounds.

I would be fine with an OT early. It would just confirm why none of those guys are under contract at this point past this year. Not idea which way all this breaks but it's wide open this year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Waldo said:

I would be fine with an OT early. It would just confirm why none of those guys are under contract at this point past this year. Not idea which way all this breaks but it's wide open this year.

The way the draft board is projected to fall it's not out of the question at all that the BPA at #8 very well could be an OT. I expect NE to go OT but that might be the only OT off the board before us. If NE doesn't go OT Maye should demand a trade.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The way the draft board is projected to fall it's not out of the question at all that the BPA at #8 very well could be an OT. I expect NE to go OT but that might be the only OT off the board before us. If NE doesn't go OT Maye should demand a trade.

It's all so unpredictable this year. OT is a better option than any other offensive position at 8 but that teir 2 clump is so similar with their 'but's so positional value should enter the discussions where OT holds strong IMO.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I do think that if there's a massive curveball thrown at #8 it's an OT. There's a lot of smoke signaling that OT is probably a lot higher on our need list than most fans would expect. We look fine on paper this year but after this year it's super cloudy and taking an OT at #8 would probably open the door to trading Moton now.

I mean, look at a team like the Bengals. Joe Burrow has been taking an unholy beating. If I'm them I'd send us a 2nd rounder for Moton without a second thought because they're shortening Burrow's career behind these OLs.

I almost expect an OT to be taken by us somewhere in the first three rounds.

I will never ever complain about picking a top 1-3 tackle in the first round no matter what our current line situation is. 

 

I still want Walker at 8 but if its tackle then so be it

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I do think that if there's a massive curveball thrown at #8 it's an OT. There's a lot of smoke signaling that OT is probably a lot higher on our need list than most fans would expect. We look fine on paper this year but after this year it's super cloudy and taking an OT at #8 would probably open the door to trading Moton now.

I mean, look at a team like the Bengals. Joe Burrow has been taking an unholy beating. If I'm them I'd send us a 2nd rounder for Moton without a second thought because they're shortening Burrow's career behind these OLs.

I almost expect an OT to be taken by us somewhere in the first three rounds.

If Dan flips the last year of Moton for a 2nd and gets a franchise LT at 8, then he's the fuging man.  That would be brilliant.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

If Dan flips the last year of Moton for a 2nd and gets a franchise LT at 8, then he's the fuging man.  That would be brilliant.

It's the type of forward thinking operating that has rarely been seen from this organization. It's the type of thing done by well ran organizations fairly regularly.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

If Dan flips the last year of Moton for a 2nd and gets a franchise LT at 8, then he's the fuging man.  That would be brilliant.

Getting a 2nd for Moton would flip how I look at Morgan. His values are too dated and that would be a 180 IMO.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Getting a 2nd for Moton would flip how I look at Morgan. His values are too dated and that would be a 180 IMO.

I honestly don't know that we could get a 2nd. I'm just saying that if I was calling the shots for the Bengals that would make a lot of sense to me. I've been watching my MVP caliber QB take an absolute beating his entire career. A 2nd rounder to help curb that even if for the relative short term seems like a well spent 2nd rounder. At 31 with potential knee issues, Moton probably isn't the long-term solution for them but he could definitely be a 2-3 year bandaid.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I honestly don't know that we could get a 2nd. I'm just saying that if I was calling the shots for the Bengals that would make a lot of sense to me. I've been watching my MVP caliber QB take an absolute beating his entire career. A 2nd rounder to help curb that even if for the relative short term seems like a well spent 2nd rounder. At 31 with potential knee issues, Moton probably isn't the long-term solution for them but he could definitely be a 2-3 year bandaid.

IDK where he is health wise so a 2nd could be the moon. Being on deal with 1 year left with noncontract talks screams volumes people around here keep ignoring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't care about offensive production for a team that literally only threw to him and the running back. I care about what I see on film:   Dude cannot separate on his own against talented LBs/S and had to be schemed open; his route running is below average; while pretty athletic, he doesn't have elite athleticism or speed; his blocking form has quite a few red flags (dude should be a dominant run blocker for his size). He was talented enough to get open in college against a slower LB/S; that won't be the case in the NFL. Not to mention, the dude pretty much was nonexistent until this year for Penn St. If I am drafting a TE in the top 10, choosing a 5th year senior that didn't do anything until his last season should be pretty alarming. Not saying he is going to be a bad player - I think he will be a solid short/intermediate possession TE in the NFL. I just don't understand the logic of taking him top 10
    • No one is arguing where we were on the season.  After the benching Bryce was one of the top deep ball passers in the league.  It's a skillset he has just shown he is capable of doing.  I believe he led the league in week 12 and was one of the top ones for that final quarter.  Dance around the topic and argue the stats all you want, I'm just going by what I saw on TV and read about.   https://x.com/PattonAnalytics/status/1877044086709854343 https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/news/bryce-young-best-against-pressure-throwing-deep Hey it surprised me as well, but I'm not going to hide my head in the sand and try to ignore what is clearly right in front of me.  People have a hard time admitting their original thought may have been wrong.  That's just the world we live in.  We will see if Young can keep it up next year or not, but signs are point to DC running his offense regardless of who is QB.  
    • You are right, but as of late there has been more rookie TEs making immediate impact on teams. McBride, Laporta, Kincaid and obv Bowers.  My true opinion is the team has so many holes they can go multiple directions including Safety. So it just comes down to out of all the talent in the draft who will make the immediate impact. Wr? TE? LB? 
×
×
  • Create New...