Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DT Mike Patterson - potential FA pick up


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

F Nick Hayden. I think he's finally come to his end in Carolina. For whatever reason, Fox kept wasting money and a roster space on this guy when he's been bad whenever he's played. He gets pushed around like he's 190 lbs rather than 290. He'd be better suited on a 3-4 team as a DE anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

F Nick Hayden. I think he's finally come to his end in Carolina. For whatever reason, Fox kept wasting money and a roster space on this guy when he's been bad whenever he's played. He gets pushed around like he's 190 lbs rather than 290. He'd be better suited on a 3-4 team as a DE anyway.

I have always thought he would be a better DE than DT, I hate Hayden but you have to admit he has made some improvement this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently he might be available given that the Eagles are going to void the last 5 years on his contract due to a technicality. Still the question remains why the Eagles want to dump him and why we want to pick him up. There is also discussion that Seattle might be in the market as well raising the thought of a bidding war.

http://gridironfans.com/forums/latest-nfl-headlines/151383-eagles-void-dt-mike-pattersons-contract.html

He is still due close to 30 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His numbers didn't exactly show it, but Landri is a decent pass rusher. He was constantly getting penetration (which he actually does have numbers to show) and if he had a decent big DT beside him, I think he'll be even better at making tackles behind the LoS.

That might apply if we drafted Fairley. But Patterson is short and more like a fireplug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't meaning to imply Patterson would be that big guy next to him, I think Patterson and Landri would rotate (Patterson on running downs, Landri on passing).

And I think Dareus would make it apply better. Fairley is also a penetrating DT, Landri needs a stuffer next to him not a penetrator.

...that sounded a lot dirtier than I intended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't meaning to imply Patterson would be that big guy next to him, I think Patterson and Landri would rotate (Patterson on running downs, Landri on passing).

And I think Dareus would make it apply better. Fairley is also a penetrating DT, Landri needs a stuffer next to him not a penetrator.

...that sounded a lot dirtier than I intended.

McDermott's defense is a penetrating defense that wants to make tackles in the backfield. As such it favors 1 gap penetrating guys who can play the pass and run. Patterson is decent but for a first rounder, he is not great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...