Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Homefront


stankowalski

Recommended Posts

I haven't read this thread and I just finished playing a few levels and some online play.

My thoughts and review.

1st. This game has emotion to it and I enjoy that, missed that actually in other games. 10

2nd. The graphics not awesome but good. COD is better. 9

3rd. Storyline the North Koreans?? seriouslyalmost killed it for me. 6

4th. Online not a fan but will play some more to see.7

5th. Controls just like COD and that is great. 10

Overall a solid game but not enough to make me buy it.

My final score is 8.4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dude you must have confused me with a cod homer. battlefield is all about objectives, and snipers get nothing but a tiny amount of points for doing nothing all game. I hate sniping. Sorry i just like a game to play well unlike hf. too much like cod for me. and also sorry i like a game with destructive enviorments. cause it makes way to much sense shooting a rocket at a wall and it explodes, right? battlefield graphics pwn hf. Like i said THQ is involved. hope your servers are still up and running in a year.
I haven't had any real problems with this game other than being unable to connect to the servers for about an hour. Apparently the people that are having problems are in large parties and they are working on that. You obviously don't remember the first couple of weeks with BFBCII...or any other game for that matter. As for the gameplay being like COD...it's not like COD, in fact I'd say it's more like Battlefield. But really it's kind of like a hybrid of the two.

I get people complaining about the servers if that's been a problem for them (hasn't been for me)...but this game is a blast to play online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

battlefield doesnt have as good of graphics as cod???? Seriously?
Yes seriously. Though that's not a bad thing (I'm not a graphics *****). And to be honest with the destructible environments it'd be tough to top COD, which doesn't have destructible environments.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im a reluctant sniper. Dont play it often. I like playing it on Cold War for the first map. On the 2nd map as attacker, sometimes i stay in sniper class, but drop the sniper rifle for a shotgun. Then i have CQ weapon, and motion sensors, and arty which works well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buddy and me were playing last night and decided to try something out. He would pull out his parrot drone and I'd slap my C4 on it. He'd then proceed to fly it across the map to a sniper that's just sitting there and tell me to detonate, blowing the sniper up lol. Doesn't even kill his drone either.

Good times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...