Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Save another Raider?


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

Raiders are widely believed to be cutting Michael Huff, Safety, loose. The understanding is that Huff has followed up a solid rookie effort and sophomore season with an ineffective 2008 and was benched, but this is the Raiders we're talking about, and not even Randy Moss was able to play well there.

Huff was a highly touted prospect and a top ten pick in 2006. Besides, Godfrey didn't really wow me at safety, and with the speculation of Lucas being pushed out, we could switch him to nickel and see how he works out there. After all, he was a cornerback in college, and all draft scouts need to believe college corners should be NFL safeties is a slow 40 time. He may have been a little out of position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you've posed this one or two years ago, then you would have a great idea. Now, I'm not sure if...

Well, actually, it still may be worth a shot. Why not? :lol:

Brayton did post a career high with 4.5 sacks (even though it was only that much lol) IMO he had the best year of his career here.

Plus, Meeks seems to have a sort of strength when it comes to working with DBs. Hell, even Idrees Bashir did some damage on the Colts defense and Bob Sanders is a buzzsaw out there at safety. He could bring the ballhawk back out of Huff if they ever did pick him up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck yeah get him in. We should always have an open competetion for every position. Godfrey did not play so well that he should be the unquestioned starter.

Harris, Marshall, Hell everyone should be scrapping for their jobs to get that edge we always want to see....but after saying all that we will most likley not see fierce competetion for established vets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heck yeah get him in. We should always have an open competetion for every position. Godfrey did not play so well that he should be the unquestioned starter.

Harris, Marshall, Hell everyone should be scrapping for their jobs to get that edge we always want to see.....

Yea this is the way I see it as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pick him up if no one is interested in him and we can get near minimum vet deal. Otherwise I would not want to get into a mini bidding war with a player who has effectively underachieved every year.

If he is vet minimum cheap then bring him in, let him battle it out and if he is Landon Johnson quality we can cut him loose int he final cuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main reason Michael Huff's productivity went down dramatically was probably due to the fact that they signed Gibril Wilson and he had a monster year for a safety. Huff started every game in the previous two seasons but only started 7 this season. He did manage to play in every game but 7 starts killed his numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raiders are widely believed to be cutting Michael Huff, Safety, loose. The understanding is that Huff has followed up a solid rookie effort and sophomore season with an ineffective 2008 and was benched, but this is the Raiders we're talking about, and not even Randy Moss was able to play well there.

Huff was a highly touted prospect and a top ten pick in 2006. Besides, Godfrey didn't really wow me at safety, and with the speculation of Lucas being pushed out, we could switch him to nickel and see how he works out there. After all, he was a cornerback in college, and all draft scouts need to believe college corners should be NFL safeties is a slow 40 time. He may have been a little out of position.

Huff would be an awesome offseason acquisition. My question is: is he a SS or FS?

I like Chris Harris, but he's a liability in coverage. I know we just signed him last offseason, but I would like to see two good coverage safeties in the defensive backfield. If Huff is more of a FS, he would be good competition for Godfrey.

Perhaps signing him to a short term "prove youerself" contract that's a win-win for both sides would be best. Somehow, I doubt the Panthers will go for it all the other offseason priorities to deal with, but it would be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huff would be an awesome offseason acquisition. My question is: is he a SS or FS?

I like Chris Harris, but he's a liability in coverage. I know we just signed him last offseason, but I would like to see two good coverage safeties in the defensive backfield. If Huff is more of a FS, he would be good competition for Godfrey.

Perhaps signing him to a short term "prove youerself" contract that's a win-win for both sides would be best. Somehow, I doubt the Panthers will go for it all the other offseason priorities to deal with, but it would be nice.

Guys we are not lacking safeties anymore. Charles Godfrey played fine for a rook and Ron Meeks is going to make them even better. We need someone to line up opposite Gamble IF the team doesn't think that Marshall is up to it (however I think that they are going to have him as the starter). If the Raiders were cutting a DLinemen then I say bring him in but there is no way that Huff would even consider coming here with established DBs. He's more likely to go to Dallas or some place like that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Him and Sanders are the only QBs I would consider in the first round. I won’t be upset if we take Sanders, unlike some people on the board. Both have potential to be really good NFL QBs if the teams can develop them.  But as we have seen teams are not willing or are unable to now properly develop rookie QBs. 
    • I remember the last time we had a Cam at QB in Charlotte
    • Because Young is so historically bad that it just skews too far outside the normal deviations that perspective is easily lost. That or they just don't want to believe it.  The struggles last year would have been more about the infighting and poor roster building or idiot owner's hiring practices than with Stroud. He wouldn't have been as good but he wouldn't have been ruined here and the pressure was not Carr-esk if you take out the Young created portion from his playing style.  Dude is a young guy on a team coached by a Defensive guy building a good D but not building up the O in year 2 of his HC 1st time gig. Seems familiar... Go look at his output this year and not just some crappy Thursday night implosion game, I would take that in a second and never ever look back every time without a shred of doubt while eating 4 of those games a year with a giant smile on my face. 
×
×
  • Create New...