Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question for 1099 people or previous 1099....


Zaximus

Recommended Posts

So I have an interview about a 1099 job tomorrow and I'm really iffy on it. I've never done this, previously I was just an employee (in the IT industry btw). It's a 3-6 month contract with possible extensions. The pay is close to what I was making at my last employee job (which of course this had paid time off, sick days, etc).

I currently have unemployment, I'm on my 2nd extension and could get up to next year on it (but I really want off it). If I take this job, and in 3 months they don't need me, I could get let go and have no chance at unemployment, correct?

I'm really hoping someone here has done this (in the IT industry) cause it may be different than other 1099. I'll probably go to the interview, I mean, why not? Can they promise a certain amount of hours you get per week so I know I'm at least getting full time?

I'm just not sure if having to pay my own taxes, pay more FICA (cause I read the employer would usually pay half those), having no sick days/paid time off, etc. Then I would have to get my own tools, use my car with no reimbursement, and a lot of other things.

Really undecided at this point. If it was a 6-12 month contract instead of a 3-6 month I'd definitely feel better.

Should I make sure I get paid at least more than I was making at my last job?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done it before (in IT). You should definitely get paid more (about 30% more) than your last job.

This. As a contractor you should be getting paid significantly more.

Paying FICA sucks but keep ALL your receipts, as a contractor you can write off everything. Keep your books in order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are going to 1099, you should get at least 20% more, but should be closer to 25%. The reason is you are taking all the risk. Also, do a credit check on the company as you are at their mercy to be paid. Unlike a W2 who gets paid on a timely basis, 1099ers get paid whenever the company feels like it. I 1099ed with a manufacturing firm for a year and I hated it. The MFers would pay their bills 3 months behind like clockwork and I had to suffer waiting to get paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are going to 1099, you should get at least 20% more, but should be closer to 25%. The reason is you are taking all the risk. Also, do a credit check on the company as you are at their mercy to be paid. Unlike a W2 who gets paid on a timely basis, 1099ers get paid whenever the company feels like it. I 1099ed with a manufacturing firm for a year and I hated it. The MFers would pay their bills 3 months behind like clockwork and I had to suffer waiting to get paid.

Not only that, but you are resposible for the state and federal taxes. So you have to put money away what a company would normally take out to cover that. When I was in real estate it was hard to put away that 25-30% for taxes and not touch it! On top of that, you have to pay for your own health care.

I hated being a 1099er.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If I’m putting myself in a team’s shoes - you’re looking at these prospects and Warren hits most boxes for a TE with a plus on most. So yeah, he’s a great prospect, no doubt, 1st round talent as a TE. But when I look at him through the lens of that PSU offense, they were running so much through him, I’m not so sure it was beneficial to seeing how he translates.  They were getting him open in the flat, running weird trick plays, and designed a lot of ways to find him on delayed seam routes and such. So a lot was structured around getting him the ball in creative ways to advance the ball, in steady sequences, methodically down the field.  Thing is, yeah he’s catching a ton, is big, and can block, but throw him into an NFL offense in a more traditional sense, he’s gonna be stickied by speedy LBs and big nickels. I just wonder how he is in a more isolated fashion— when he’s just a piece of a greater NFL offense getting shadowed by more talented defenders. I think it could still be great but I have question marks when it’s at the TE position. Will he look no different than other very solid TEs or is he this offensive centerpiece at the position that doesn’t come along often (Bowers, Gronk, Kelce, Witten, TG, etc)? I think he brings a ton and could be one of the safer TE prospects, but what I’m unsure about is if you’re really getting this new age Witten type people are crowning him as. Even if that’s the case, is that worth it? If he wasn’t in PSU’s Franklin/Allar offense, would you be seeing the same output?  More questions than anything - I could get on board with it, but it’s hard for me to really project because of how that offense was (which was so frustrating at times). 
    • Twitter sources, but supposedly the Rams want him. He might actually go Round 1. 
    • You aren't going to ever get him out of the equation. As he has stated previously, he believes it his right to make the final call on decisions. 
×
×
  • Create New...