Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

bad time to run the 4-3..draft wise


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

i my self like the 4-3 more the 3-4 but draft wise this year is a bad time to have needs in the 4-3..its a goldmine this year for all the teams moveing to a 3-4.

look at are needs DT and DE both are super weak in the draft this year. more than that, the ones that are rated high are suited for the 3-4 more than the 4-3.

even if we get in the first round who do we get i mean are pick will not be top 10. it will be interesting to see how the FO deals with this.

its just a bad year to run a 4-3 draft wise seeing as how the top DE and DT are better suited to be in a 3-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DTs and DEs are just as important in 3-4 schemes. I don't buy that this is a bad draft for 4-3 Ds.

yea they are just as important but whats required of them are differnet in the schemes..and most are saying that top DE and DTs are better suited for the 3-4 in this years draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea they are just as important but whats required of them are differnet in the schemes..and most are saying that top DE and DTs are better suited for the 3-4 in this years draft

I'm afraid I've gotta agree here. Outside of Evander Hood, there are no really good DT prospects for a 4-3 team here. Most of the DTs in this year's draft would either be 3-4 Ends or converted to DEs on a 4-3 team. After the second round, the average weight for a DT in this class is about 290.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't argue that as I've barely looked at the draft class this year. But if this year is weak at DT then teams converting will have a rough time if they don't already have a NT in place. If you don't have a good NT then you don't have a good 3-4 D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think we are in a tight spot this year. As much as I want to see this team win we are gonna have to get lucky this off-season with a small cap and bad talent in the draft. On top of all that we play the NFC East and AFC East and even if some of those teams are bad next year majority will be good as well as our Div.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think we are in a tight spot this year. As much as I want to see this team win we are gonna have to get lucky this off-season with a small cap and bad talent in the draft. On top of all that we play the NFC East and AFC East and even if some of those teams are bad next year majority will be good as well as our Div.

Yup, I don't think that this drafts limitations are on the Dline. To me it seems like a bleh kind of class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a good DT is a good DT, system be damned. Same for DEs. Good personnel will adhere to and fit into a good system. Good system means much more than just Xs' and Os' on a blackboard, its all about how well the coaches implementing the schemes are at communicating responsibilities, roles, reads, etc., etc. I'm confident the scouts in this league will do as they always do, and find the real gems in the middle and late rounds..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Him and Sanders are the only QBs I would consider in the first round. I won’t be upset if we take Sanders, unlike some people on the board. Both have potential to be really good NFL QBs if the teams can develop them.  But as we have seen teams are not willing or are unable to now properly develop rookie QBs. 
    • I remember the last time we had a Cam at QB in Charlotte
    • Because Young is so historically bad that it just skews too far outside the normal deviations that perspective is easily lost. That or they just don't want to believe it.  The struggles last year would have been more about the infighting and poor roster building or idiot owner's hiring practices than with Stroud. He wouldn't have been as good but he wouldn't have been ruined here and the pressure was not Carr-esk if you take out the Young created portion from his playing style.  Dude is a young guy on a team coached by a Defensive guy building a good D but not building up the O in year 2 of his HC 1st time gig. Seems familiar... Go look at his output this year and not just some crappy Thursday night implosion game, I would take that in a second and never ever look back every time without a shred of doubt while eating 4 of those games a year with a giant smile on my face. 
×
×
  • Create New...