Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2009 Franchise Tag numbers


panthers55

Recommended Posts

Here are the franchise tag numbers for 2009

http://dal.scout.com/2/834624.html

So if Gross were franchised it would be 120 of his current salary or 8.45 million whichever was greater. Salary in 2008 was 7.45 so his tag amount will be 8.95million.

Peppers we already know.

Amazing that the franchise tag for a QB is over 14 million. while they are important of course it means that over 10% of the total cap is in one salary. Much like us with Peppers. In fact Gross and Peppers combined almost account for 1/5 of our total cap. Sure they are good but I really think the numbers are getting out of control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really. the cornerstones of any great franchise are QB, LT and a pass rushing RDE so that is where a good chunk of your cap room should be.

Those are the positions which command a high amount. Still there are many teams who do well and pay quite a bit less than we do.

But if you notice RDE and LT have escalated quite a bit for us in the last few years to the point that our RDE is the highest in the league if we don't trade him (by a large margin) and our LT also wants to be paid the highest in the league. I am not convinced either of them are worth that kind of money.

Teams like NE have built a dynasty trading away or letting high priced guys walk and replacing them with much cheaper guys. Now they have the same dilemma at QB with almost 29 million committed to the QB position. Wonder if they will trade Cassells late if Brady fully recovers or eat both salaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Him and Sanders are the only QBs I would consider in the first round. I won’t be upset if we take Sanders, unlike some people on the board. Both have potential to be really good NFL QBs if the teams can develop them.  But as we have seen teams are not willing or are unable to now properly develop rookie QBs. 
    • I remember the last time we had a Cam at QB in Charlotte
    • Because Young is so historically bad that it just skews too far outside the normal deviations that perspective is easily lost. That or they just don't want to believe it.  The struggles last year would have been more about the infighting and poor roster building or idiot owner's hiring practices than with Stroud. He wouldn't have been as good but he wouldn't have been ruined here and the pressure was not Carr-esk if you take out the Young created portion from his playing style.  Dude is a young guy on a team coached by a Defensive guy building a good D but not building up the O in year 2 of his HC 1st time gig. Seems familiar... Go look at his output this year and not just some crappy Thursday night implosion game, I would take that in a second and never ever look back every time without a shred of doubt while eating 4 of those games a year with a giant smile on my face. 
×
×
  • Create New...