Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Battlefield 3 out Fall 2011

YoungPanthers89

By YoungPanthers89,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

necroplasm Newbie

necroplasm

Posted
Posted

too bad you couldn't actually play either of them online or get a decent ping when you do manage to operate the mighty sony network

I wasn't bringing PC online into the discussion. lol Consoles are just consoles...but the PS3 is a quality system. I know devs are selling out..I'm sorry man. It sucks. If it wasn't for all that, I would go to more PC gaming. But I like most consoles...it's just part of me...don't need super powerful specs to play games. It's just does not justify me forking out the extra cash. It's obvious PC gaming is the superior experience...as it should be...lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
necroplasm Newbie

necroplasm

Posted
Posted

Mag was frikin terrible, i dont care how big the maps are or how many people you can fit into a server.

I didn't think it was really that good either but what makes Battlefield so damn better? lol

sorry for ambushing this game but you said MAG was laughable..so. it's an opinion

is just really disoriented

This is what I mean by that.

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Porn Shop Clerk Enthusiast

Porn Shop Clerk

Posted
Posted

I wasn't bringing PC online into the discussion. lol Consoles are just consoles...but the PS3 is a quality system. I know devs are selling out..I'm sorry man. It sucks. If it wasn't for all that, I would go to more PC gaming. But I like most consoles...it's just part of me...don't need super powerful specs to play games. It's just does not justify me forking out the extra cash. It's obvious PC gaming is the superior experience...as it should be...lol.

i don't fork out extra cash. you can get a shitty 360 for 200 bux, but that's without a hard drive or controllers. and then you still have to pay 100$ a year for their shitty online service. so after 3 years of buying games for 60$ a pop compared to 50$ release on pc, and the live service, you're easily in over what you would pay for a pc that can play anything on the market

ps3 is only slightly better since it doesn't charge for online service, but the online service sucks anyway.

i'm definitely not saying bf3 would be better on pc

i just can't help but laugh everytime someone reminds me how far behind the console really is

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YoungPanthers89 Contributor

YoungPanthers89

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I didn't think it was really that good either but what makes Battlefield so damn better? lol

sorry for ambushing this game but you said MAG was laughable..so. it's an opinion

This is what I mean by that.

lol

A beta running with a 2 month old build with the smallest map without any vehicles, sorry you cant quickscope newbs in this game. IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
necroplasm Newbie

necroplasm

Posted
Posted

i don't fork out extra cash. you can get a shitty 360 for 200 bux, but that's without a hard drive or controllers. and then you still have to pay 100$ a year for their shitty online service. so after 3 years of buying games for 60$ a pop compared to 50$ release on pc, and the live service, you're easily in over what you would pay for a pc that can play anything on the market

ps3 is only slightly better since it doesn't charge for online service, but the online service sucks anyway.

i'm definitely not saying bf3 would be better on pc

i just can't help but laugh everytime someone reminds me how far behind the console really is

slightly better? lol hardware, exclusive games. quantity & quality ...man, before the last 360 model released, you had to buy all those damn add ons, then pray to Horus for that damn thing to not blow up the trailer park.

After investing into the PS for so long...I just don't really need a 2011 gaming rig right now...that's some nice slick exclusive games to buy and coke to fry, fly to tha moon with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
necroplasm Newbie

necroplasm

Posted
Posted

A beta running with a 2 month old build with the smallest map without any vehicles, sorry you cant quickscope newbs in this game. IMO.

lol the n00b argument. no matter how you master the game, it plays like poo in my eyes.

demo is what you get. everyone says that about game beta. it will be the same poo. better, yes, but the same.

btw that was the first video I spotted...so take it fwiw

Link to comment
Share on other sites
YoungPanthers89 Contributor

YoungPanthers89

Posted
  • Author
Posted

lol the n00b argument. no matter how you master the game, it plays like poo in my eyes.

demo is what you get. everyone says that about game beta. it will be the same poo. better, yes, but the same.

btw that was the first video I spotted...so take it fwiw

The beta was basically bf3 but without all the things that make it battlefield, it will absolutely be better in the real game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mrcompletely11
      Edge Rushers

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • MHS831
      High look overview...

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Jackie Lee
      Dream big: Imagine this future and tell me how you feel

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...