Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Battlefield 3 out Fall 2011


YoungPanthers89

Recommended Posts

The beta code is like 2 months old, the beta is strictly for testing network load capacity although some little things are being fixed from the feedback. Don't worry. Not to mention Microsoft frowns on demo/betas being over 2gig so they had less to work with.

Yeah the code is old and nowhere near the final version. So hopefully they've already fixed the prone issue and the grenade issue. I can't tell you how many time i've thrown a grenade only to have it stick on a leaf and blow my face off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody cares about your k-d ratio in this game....I've played with people who went 4-17 in the beta and they were great teammates and were able to help us get the win on offense.....

This. We used to play rush a ton on BC2 and we would have guys who were horrible at gunning, but they would go to the front lines for us and drop ammo and med-kits. We could go in unloading clips and know that more ammo was just around the corner. Teamwork is definitely key.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the code is old and nowhere near the final version. So hopefully they've already fixed the prone issue and the grenade issue. I can't tell you how many time i've thrown a grenade only to have it stick on a leaf and blow my face off.

Rofl, I thought I could throw it through a window but that clearly didn't work.

Also, I hate how you can't "cook" grenades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah i'm not getting the non-cooking of grenades either. Seems like that should be a no brainer as it is an actual tactic used when throwing real grenades.

I always heard it was discouraged since the fuze length isn't always the same for every grenade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this franchise plays so sluggish. will rent 3 to give it a chance, ugh.

just don't understand the popularity.

killzone has a similar issue with me. heavy gunplay feel.. gives me headaches.

The game is a team based game, objective based, not Rambo CoD style. You take your time, look around corners, communicate, heal/drop ammo crates, etc, with the goal of taking points.

It's just different. Why would we want another CoD clone out there? That's boring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The game is a team based game

It's just different. Why would we want another CoD clone out there? That's boring.

Yes...I only enjoy run and gun twitch shooters like CoD. :rolleyes:

lol I actually enjoyed MAG.. which is quite similar.

BFMP is just really disoriented. There actually is tactical team based games out there that play fluidly...I like..doesn't mean I don't like the FPS concept that Battlefield has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes...I only enjoy run and gun twitch shooters like CoD. :rolleyes:

lol I actually enjoyed MAG.. which is quite similar.

BFMP is just really disoriented. There actually is tactical team based games out there that play fluidly...I like..doesn't mean I don't like the FPS concept that Battlefield has.

lolmag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...