Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

[The Athletic] Dane Brugler's 2025 7-round Mock Draft


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 4/17/2025 at 3:41 PM, kungfoodude said:

I love Bech. A guy with some speed that can actually catch the ball.

I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do

Yeah, this WR class has some very good candidates to be productive NFL WR's, if not many candidates to be NFL stars. 

Currently, the only truly consistent and productive WR we have had since the Moore trade is AT. One would think we would eventually attempt to remedy that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, this WR class has some very good candidates to be productive NFL WR's, if not many candidates to be NFL stars. 

Currently, the only truly consistent and productive WR we have had since the Moore trade is AT. One would think we would eventually attempt to remedy that.

I thinkall we need at this point is a productive WR.  I'm not sure Bryce needs a true #1 WR

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, we focus on gambling on these project #1 WR types versus the obviously better and more productive players.

Also, I think Bryce is best when he spreads the ball around.  Feeding a true #1 takes away Bryce's best ability which is to find the open guy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, this WR class has some very good candidates to be productive NFL WR's, if not many candidates to be NFL stars. 

Currently, the only truly consistent and productive WR we have had since the Moore trade is AT. One would think we would eventually attempt to remedy that.

We have far surpassed attempting we have thrown too much at that fuging position to have nothing to show for it. 

2024 1st, 2023 2nd, 2021 2nd and yet here we are still needing WRs....

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

We have far surpassed attempting we have thrown too much at that fuging position to have nothing to show for it. 

2024 1st, 2023 2nd, 2021 2nd and yet here we are still needing WRs....

Fair point. Hence why as upset as people were about a theoretical trade for Higgins, at least it would have removed us from likely fuging up another WR evaluation again.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...