Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers go No.1: P.P.


TANTRIC-NINJA

Recommended Posts

Read the recap for the game. Most of the offense came at the end of the game and we don't know if Peterson was the one covering him or not. not to mention Green had an excessive celebration call WITH THE GAME ON THE LINE which ended up giving LSU really good field position to win it.

anywho, I like peterson because he's got the size, the speed, the instincts and balls skills to play the position at a high level. Add in to the fact that Rivera is part of our organization and the level at which his corners have typically excelled.. You gotta go with Peterson as the safe pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read the recap for the game. Most of the offense came at the end of the game and we don't know if Peterson was the one covering him or not. not to mention Green had an excessive celebration call WITH THE GAME ON THE LINE which ended up giving LSU really good field position to win it.

anywho, I like peterson because he's got the size, the speed, the instincts and balls skills to play the position at a high level. Add in to the fact that Rivera is part of our organization and the level at which his corners have typically excelled.. You gotta go with Peterson as the safe pick.

when I click the link I dont see that LSU played GA this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the potential that PP would bring to our back 4. Guy has been sick in this season. However if we do take PP #1, Rivera and the Wrecking Crew better address the DT position through FA. Our durrent DT situation allows us to get NO pressure on the QB and it would not matter who we had in the back 4....they would continuously get toasted.

I think a DT FA is almost certain on top of any draft picks we may select on the D-line. I'm still on the Ellis/Fua/Powe train in the 3rd or 4th, even more so if we pick Green or Peterson (which imo makes the most sense)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the idea of coverage generating sacks but I don't see the pick as likely. You want balance on D and the line sucks inside and on the right end. When I look around the league there aren't of a huge number of teams who aren't fielding a bum at the #2 receiver spot, and have qb to get the ball to him.

Passing on Bowers/Fairley or Green so we can have Gamble or PP covering Sammie Stroughter and Mike Jenkins seems like a waste when they could just resign Marshall to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still say we should take a look at Asomugha. I know, I know, he is going to want a huge contract. Well, I say it would be worth giving him that contract if we could bring him in and draft Fairley. Sign him long-term so it wouldn't be such a cap hit (give him a 7 year deal or longer, if possible.) Hey, we gave Jake Delhomme a 40 million deal after a sad performance in the playoffs. (And an average year at QB with a great receiver) The least we can do is give a big contract to a player that deserves it.

First we resign our key guys, then we look at Aso and offer him a deal. If he bites, good. If he doesn't, we'll do something else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still say we should take a look at Asomugha. I know, I know, he is going to want a huge contract. Well, I say it would be worth giving him that contract if we could bring him in and draft Fairley. Sign him long-term so it wouldn't be such a cap hit (give him a 7 year deal or longer, if possible.) Hey, we gave Jake Delhomme a 40 million deal after a sad performance in the playoffs. (And an average year at QB with a great receiver) The least we can do is give a big contract to a player that deserves it.

First we resign our key guys, then we look at Aso and offer him a deal. If he bites, good. If he doesn't, we'll do something else.

be much smarter to bring in a FA DT (or 2) and draft Peterson...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

be much smarter to bring in a FA DT (or 2) and draft Peterson...

If Haloti Ngata fell through, I would definitely go after him and draft Peterson. It would be great to have a solid pass rush coming from the middle, and Fairley has that potential about him. If Greg Hardy shows he's ready to start, we would have three guys capable of producing pressure. (Hardy, Fairley, and Johnson) Of course if Ngata became available, I would love to draft Peterson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's a decent vid with compelling reasons for his opinion. But, my thing is is that you simply can't draft McMillan thinking he is a surefire WR1. There are questions. His 40---rightly or wrongly---will play a part. I'd think that his splits (which will speak more to his game translating to the pros in my mind) are more important.  As much as you're trying to sell us that McMillan is a don't-overthink-it-type-of-player, I wouldn't say that's the case. Workouts will play a part in all of this.  At this point, I like the thought of Tetairoa. That's as much as I can give you right now.
    • If Canales has helped Bryce a “poo ton” and this is what we have then what’s the fuging point? And the offense wasn’t humming with Dalton in there either, except against the raiders who’ll likely be firing their coach after this season.  XL is probably the fourth best looking receiving option on the team right now behind thielen, Coker, and sanders. I don’t think anyone would disagree with that. Who cares about total receiving yards when everyone else has missed time and there’s like 180 yards of receiving a game to go around   and lmao they were “believing” shut the fug up. They lost and for the most part those games were all the defense shutting down the other team. The chiefs turned around and gave up an actual impressive stat line to Aiden O’Connell and I not even the most delusional raiders fans think that means anything. Bryce did nothing against the eagles, the Bucs are a mash unit, and any one of us could have done that Bryce did against the giants and saints.  And as far as who they’d get, they didn’t have any trouble hiring the guy you’re tripping over yourself to defend. They also could have hired Dan Quinn, who’s actually succeeding with a young qb.  And people are acting like the risk of getting paid for not working for five years is a negative. Canales is going to spend the next half a decade getting paid to watch porn in his Bible camp office.
    • the Dallas game definitely quelled the hype. his biggest issue will always be his size, and that shows when he gets sacked. he's simply not big or strong enough to protect the ball. even in the KC game, he fumbled it on a basic sack and thank god icky landed on it. INT's are going to happen, most fans don't understand that tipped balls and wrong routes account for most interceptions. but the wet-bar-of-soap type fumbles upon contact are a huge reg flag. the common theme with players like Darnold and Mayfield who previously played for us and are now excelling makes me want to practice patience more when it comes to the QB position. I think Bryce bought himself another season, perhaps with more weapons. I do like the idea of adding a QB whether that's a FA or mid round rookie. if the same mistakes occur next season and we see no further growth or most importantly, wins, then it will be time to move on. just a quick reminder though, football is not an individual sport. QB is just one position, albeit the most important. 
×
×
  • Create New...