Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Poker Stars Home Games

Jangler

By Jangler,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

neverlosethefeeling Apprentice

neverlosethefeeling

Posted
Posted

hummm not too impressed with poker stars at all.

I don't see anything, tried to restart.. Full Tilt doesn't have anything like this? Def agree, poker stars doesn't impress me much..

I have spent countless hours playing online poker and PS is by FAR the best. Full Tilt has higher quality players.. that's pretty much well known. Once you play long enough, it's easy to figure out the play of the fishy players on PokerStars. You'll experience the bad beats and awful calls... the worse a player is, the more impossible it is to bluff. Once you can get over that, or at least build a bankroll large enough to support moving up in limit, you'll realize that PS is top notch not only in user-friendliness (it's got the best interface hands down), but tournament selection and just sheer volume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Table is create NL 5/10.

Cannot create this table as it would exceed the maximum play money limit for the club.

For some reason it still won't let me create a table. Need a stud table. I have to be at a stud table.

I tried to join but got a error message telling me to go *** myself.??confused??

Really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Stumpy
      Canes vs Devils Game 5 Rd 7:30pm

      By Stumpy · Posted

    • Basbear
      Draft Grades

      By Basbear · Posted

    • tukafan21
      Panthers NFC South Champs!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      First on T-Mac, I 100% expect him to be the top WR from this class, however I think expecting him to put up 1k+ as a rookie isn't necessarily fair, especially since you're putting it in perspective of how many other rookie WRs have done that in recent years. And Thielen is the reason for that. Not many (if any) of those 1k+ rookies had someone like Thielen there when they were drafted, and no matter how good T-Mac is this year, Bryce is still going to lean on his existing chemistry with Thielen unless he's drastically lost a step this offseason and just can't get open like he's been able to in his career. As I pointed out in another thread the other day, looking at MHJ last year is the way to look at T-Mac's season if Thielen plays a full and healthy season.  MHJ had McBride "steal" 110+ catches and 1,100+ yards in what was a pass happy offense (Kyler was 9th in the league in attempts), it's going to be hard for any rookie to put up more than the 800ish yards he had last year in that scenario.  Especially if we follow a similar game plan to last year and be a run heavy team. In terms of XL, you're completely right, jumping up to get a project 2/3 isn't smart, and if we knew we needed a future slot from that pick, yes, Ladd would have been a much better pick. But at this point, those are all sunk costs, even taking T-Mac at 8 is now considered a sunk cost. Forgetting the past or who we maybe should have taken last year now knowing future roles, I still think T-Mac, XL, Coker can be one of the Top 1-3 WR rooms in the NFL in a few years, I honestly think they really do have that potential in them.
×
×
  • Create New...