Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Veteran QBs: Picking the right one


MHS831

Recommended Posts

Many times a quarterback's physical skills start to wane just as they really understand the game and defenses on a complex level expands. They know exactly what to do the ball but can't always make the throws or stay healthy. There value to a team is more in what they know than whether or not they can be a long term starter. To that end both Volek and Anderson would be very valuable to the organization and not a distraction as Newton develops. Just watching film together and pointing out the nuances of the game will be invaluable to Newton over time. Neither Volek or Anderson would be valuable as long-term starters but they surely would be valuable to our franchise over the next season or two.

Admittedly neither of them have much to merit them as a starter and there are other guys I like better but given the lack of time to learn Chud's system we likely need someone who can come in right away and play.

problem is i don't like either guys set of intangibles and don't see them as being someone i want around my up and coming franchise QB. just knowing the system isn't enough to make me want either of them here. i'd rather have volek than DA, but i really want neither of these guys around. i don't care how well they know the system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two names? Where has Chud coached before other than Cleveland & SD at the NFL level? Or is it even a Chud guy? Could just be someone from the same general system. Hell, maybe they'll drag Dorsey out of retirement...

DeAngelo said to "think about our offensive coordinator," which obviously gave me in the impression that it was going to be a Chud guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

problem is i don't like either guys set of intangibles and don't see them as being someone i want around my up and coming franchise QB. just knowing the system isn't enough to make me want either of them here. i'd rather have volek than DA, but i really want neither of these guys around. i don't care how well they know the system.

What do you know about either of their intangibles or their work ethic? Before you decide you don't want them, get to know them. Anderson was picked over Leinart because he was deemed to have better leadership skills and better intangibles.

Here are a few articles about Anderson both recent and how he rated out of college. He has great leadership and is very hard working. He just has questionable accuracy and makes poor decisions at times. Things that you don't pass on to rookies. Work ethic and leadership you do.

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/cardinals/articles/2010/08/29/20100829arizona-cardinals-starting-quarterback-decision.html

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-24412.html

Here is an article on Volek:

http://www.sportspundit.com/football/players/2179-billy-volek

If you are looking for a starter then you need to move on. if you are wanting a guy to mentor Cam and serve as a backup, then both of these guys will be good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you know about either of their intangibles or their work ethic? Before you decide you don't want them, get to know them. Anderson was picked over Leinart because he was deemed to have better leadership skills and better intangibles.

Here are a few articles about Anderson both recent and how he rated out of college. He has great leadership and is very hard working. He just has questionable accuracy and makes poor decisions at times. Things that you don't pass on to rookies. Work ethic and leadership you do.

http://www.azcentral.com/sports/cardinals/articles/2010/08/29/20100829arizona-cardinals-starting-quarterback-decision.html

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-24412.html

Here is an article on Volek:

http://www.sportspundit.com/football/players/2179-billy-volek

If you are looking for a starter then you need to move on. if you are wanting a guy to mentor Cam and serve as a backup, then both of these guys will be good.

do i know them? nope. but i know enough about them.

re: anderson...the bar was set pretty low with leinart. he had very little respect from the team. it wouldn't take much to get chosen ahead of him, but even at that, they were massively disappointed in what they got from DA. how could they not be? the stats speak volumes. the dude was just as horrible there as he was for most of his time in cleveland. but then we aren't talking about him as a starter, are we? still, we want our backup to be competent, don't we? he hasn't shown he can be that. intangibles...how does he handle pressure and criticism? from what i have seen, not very well. it wasn't just the tirade he had after getting criticized/questioned for laughing during a humiliating loss on monday night football. did the reporter make it a bigger deal than it should have been? probably. did anderson make a bigger deal out of it than he needed? absolutely.

what made it worse is that he continued fighting about it against a fan on twitter late into the night.(link and link) if that was the only time he had reacted like that, i'd be more willing to sweep it under the rug, but it wasn't so i won't. look for his reaction to being let go from cleveland. he lashed out at the fans in a very unprofessional manner that he later had to apologize for. the major issue i have is if he acts like this outside of the locker room and in with the public, how does he act inside the locker room?

now, you'll probably be able to find articles talking about how much faith the players have in anderson...back in september. where was it in the weeks and months that followed? where is that support and faith now? where is that talk of him being a leader? it isn't there. good luck finding any positive comments about him from his team. they may be there, but i haven't seen them. from what i can tell, they just don't care about keeping him around. i just think we can do better as a mentor than that guy. his knowledge of chud's offense won't make him worth the bother, imo.

as for volek...ugh...i've gone on about him a lot in the past. i just don't like him. i don't see a guy with a strong work ethic (part of the reason that the titans brought in kerry collins...they were hoping it would light a fire under volek) and when he found out that he was actually going to work to get the start instead of just having it handed to him after mcnair left, he asked for a trade anywhere. people are way too high on the guy for his few games of relevance years ago. he just doesn't seem like someone i want to have mentoring my franchise guy. he may know a lot about the offense, but what can he offer about being a professional? what significant playing experience can he draw from to help newton? there just isn't much.

i don't have any illusions about having a starter quality backup to mentor newton. knowledge about the system is good, but aside from that i want someone who has a positive attitude even when things get rough and someone who has had a good deal of playing experience to draw from.

i just don't see anderson or volek being that guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

do i know them? nope. but i know enough about them.

re: anderson...the bar was set pretty low with leinart. he had very little respect from the team. it wouldn't take much to get chosen ahead of him, but even at that, they were massively disappointed in what they got from DA. how could they not be? the stats speak volumes. the dude was just as horrible there as he was for most of his time in cleveland. but then we aren't talking about him as a starter, are we? still, we want our backup to be competent, don't we? he hasn't shown he can be that. intangibles...how does he handle pressure and criticism? from what i have seen, not very well. it wasn't just the tirade he had after getting criticized/questioned for laughing during a humiliating loss on monday night football. did the reporter make it a bigger deal than it should have been? probably. did anderson make a bigger deal out of it than he needed? absolutely.

what made it worse is that he continued fighting about it against a fan on twitter late into the night.(link and link) if that was the only time he had reacted like that, i'd be more willing to sweep it under the rug, but it wasn't so i won't. look for his reaction to being let go from cleveland. he lashed out at the fans in a very unprofessional manner that he later had to apologize for. the major issue i have is if he acts like this outside of the locker room and in with the public, how does he act inside the locker room?

now, you'll probably be able to find articles talking about how much faith the players have in anderson...back in september. where was it in the weeks and months that followed? where is that support and faith now? where is that talk of him being a leader? it isn't there. good luck finding any positive comments about him from his team. they may be there, but i haven't seen them. from what i can tell, they just don't care about keeping him around. i just think we can do better as a mentor than that guy. his knowledge of chud's offense won't make him worth the bother, imo.

as for volek...ugh...i've gone on about him a lot in the past. i just don't like him. i don't see a guy with a strong work ethic (part of the reason that the titans brought in kerry collins...they were hoping it would light a fire under volek) and when he found out that he was actually going to work to get the start instead of just having it handed to him after mcnair left, he asked for a trade anywhere. people are way too high on the guy for his few games of relevance years ago. he just doesn't seem like someone i want to have mentoring my franchise guy. he may know a lot about the offense, but what can he offer about being a professional? what significant playing experience can he draw from to help newton? there just isn't much.

i don't have any illusions about having a starter quality backup to mentor newton. knowledge about the system is good, but aside from that i want someone who has a positive attitude even when things get rough and someone who has had a good deal of playing experience to draw from.

i just don't see anderson or volek being that guy.

You make some good points about Anderson's public persona and his reactions to the media. And what he was doing on twitter makes little sense as well.

Still the kind of intangibles and leadership we need is more on the field and in the locker room. I haven't heard much in the way of negatives there, have you?? Anderson is surely not starter material in my book still Shula did a pretty good job in Jacksonville with Garrard so I think that Anderson might be okay here. Part of the issue in Arizona was that they had a dismal running game and a porous line so that it was a perfect storm for Anderson and he surely went down with the ship. Don't get me wrong here, I don't think he is a prize by any notion yet as a backup quarterback he could do the job.

Volek is a big unknown and always has been. There has been no definitive comments to even suggest that he would want to come here. He seems content to play behind Rivers and be the backup.

The issue is really who is out there that would make a good backup in our situation. It is clear Newton is the heir apparent and it is simply when he starts not if. Not exactly an ideal situation for someone coming in to supposedly compete.

Who is out there who fit the criteria that William's noted? Who is even out there and available who would be able to play in Chud's system without starting from scratch? We aren't exactly the Patriots or Steelers and folks are not dying to come here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The issue is really who is out there that would make a good backup in our situation. It is clear Newton is the heir apparent and it is simply when he starts not if. Not exactly an ideal situation for someone coming in to supposedly compete.

Who is out there who fit the criteria that William's noted? Who is even out there and available who would be able to play in Chud's system without starting from scratch? We aren't exactly the Patriots or Steelers and folks are not dying to come here.

i agree with that top paragraph i quoted. we need to have a solid backup for newton. the unfortunate thing is that just by newton being a rookie, more than likely anyone brought in to be a backup will in a way be mentoring newton...or at least showing him the ropes. the tough thing will be finding someone who understands that their role will be limited to just that...helping newton learn and backing him up. finding someone who will be a positive guy with a solid work ethic and the heart of a coach is more important than having someone that has knowledge of the system. that guy is going to be able to pick it up pretty easily (unless they are coming from a WCO).

william's comments do have you thinking that it will be someone he has coached before. choices are very limited. aside from rivers that pretty much leaves anderson, volek, brady quinn, and ken dorsey. dorsey and quinn get scratched off that list real quick. it's pretty close to a given that anderson won't be the cards QB next year, even though he's still under contract (supposed to be getting a little over $4mil this year). volek may understand his role for the remainder of his career is going to be that of a backup, but why would he leave san diego for carolina to do the same job? carolina would have to pay significantly more than what the chargers would to get him out here.

i don't know. it just doesn't make sense. its going to be a tough sell and someone desperate for a roster spot in the twilight of their career. that in itself is a very limited field. add to that someone with experience with chud....it would have to be volek.

did williams specify chud, or just the system? because if its the system, then that opens things up a tiny bit, but then it's guys like kerry collins who played for norv in oakland.

meh....i trust rivera & co until they give me a reason not to. they've made good decisions so far, imo. rivera and chud both know him. if they bring in a guy like volek, he must be ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just watched Deangelo Williams' livestream on Facebook where he was answering fans questions. He gave a hint on which Veteran QB the staff is looking at, but he wouldn't say who it was.. He said the QB is familiar with Chud's Offense, so that leads me to believe it's either Derek Anderson or Billy Volek.

Deangelo wouldn't lie to his fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear OP, how is Pike a bust? =o He only threw for 12 passes...

Anyways, I agree with Rayzor (well I read two posts so eh) that Anderson isn't the guy, and getting Volek would have probably cost much more. Getting someone to mentor just because they have worked with someone before is silly.

Mentoring goes beyond knowing the offensive system. They should have likable personalities, be mature, etc etc. I have seen Anderson do things (such as outburst because of bad plays) that have repealed me from wanted him as a mentor. Oh well, we have him now, hopefully Pike will beat him out for third string. :3 I'd laugh so hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you can tell much about how Anderson will be in the locker room based on that outburst interview or even his past. Just like you couldn't tell how Rnady Moss would be in NE based on how he was in Oakland.

Each team and locker room has their own chemistry and make-up based on the players, staff, coaches, and individual situations. So to decide he is or isn't the guy may or may not be accurate. In anycase we gave him a 1 year contract so it isn't as if we are losing much either way. Lets play this out and see what happens. There is a chance that he may actually be our starting Qb this year in a more QB friendly system. He is surely not the long term solution but he may be a stop gap until Newton or Clausen have picked things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've explained this in more detail before. Briefly, there's a process to quickly evaluate a QB. Also, there's a type of QB that excels at a higher rate than others at the pro level. After that, it's about keeping the QBs flowing through the system. 1st round QBs are not superior, they just get more reps and game time. You can find just as many competitive QBs that are 3rd day or undrafted if you give them the same reps and game time. Now, to dive deeper for fun. To understand this further, there are rare 1st round QB exceptions, but they must come with a pro pedigree and proven success in college. There's only 1 to 3 of these QBs every decade (John Elway 1983, Peyton Manning 1998, Eli Manning 2004, Andrew Luck 2012, Jared Goff 2016, Patrick Mahomes 2017, and Joe Burrow 2020. That's 1 of every 20 1st round QBs (5% of historical 1st round QBs in modern draft era). When you look at 1st rd QB success, eliminate these rare ones from your samples because they are trained to be championship QBs. 100% of them have taken their team to a championship. Also, the Bill Walsh tree knows the formula for building an offense and finding a QB QUICKLY. The question is why haven't others figured it out & continue to waste draft capital on QBs? Based on my QB evaluation system, here's the QBs I had slotted for the Panthers over the past 10 drafts. Patrick Mahomes, Brad Kaaya, Cooper Rush, Lamar Jackson, Brett Rypien, Tyler Huntley, Jalen Hurts, Shane Buechele, Desmond Ridder, Brock Purdy, Aqeel Glass, Jack Coan, Aidan O'Connell, Tanner McKee, Spencer Rattler, Devin Leary, Sam Hartman, Quinn Ewers. The ones in bold were the ones that rated the highest for pro championship qualities (probable franchise QBs). Obviously,  we didn't need them all, but it's about flow of pro championship qualities shown in college and not the most physically gifted. Also, there are a few QBs every decade who have the qualities, but never get a chance. If your talent evaluation/QB system is good enough, you can go get 2 to 3 of them tomorrow to show what they can do when their name is called. I expect 1 of every 6 QBs to be worthy of being a franchise QB. There's strict rules to the depth chart qualifications, rotation, minimum KPIs and cuts/trades for me. Panthers have had Collins, Beuerlein, Weinke, Delhomme, Clausen, Newton, Bridgewater, Darnold, and Young. If you include Lewis, Peete, Allen and Mayfield, the Panthers have had 3 of 13 championship level franchise QBs. 1 of 5 (1 of 6 if you don't count Collins). It's the same for every franchise. The difference is a certain coaching tree knows how to move them through quicker than all the others while building defense with the most valuable draft picks. For Walsh, Montana(3rd rd) was his 3rd QB and Young(trade) was his 12th (9 yrs). He had a process allowing him to move through them rapidly. For Holmgren, Favre(trade) was his 4th QB and Hasselbeck(6th rd/trade) was his 15th QB (10 yrs). Neither of them settled on or tried to solve the problems of their 1st QB. For Andy Reid, McNabb(1st rd) was his 2nd QB and Mahomes(1st rd) was his 15th QB (19yrs). For John Harbaugh, Flacco(1st rd) was his 1st and Jackson(1st rd) was his 8th (11 yrs). For Sean McVay, Goff(1st rd) was his 1st and Stafford(trade) was his 5th (5yrs). Reid was the slow and stubborn one who wouldn't move on from his QB & had to wait nearly 2 decades to grab a QB that is the rare exception. I present this to show how 1st round picks are wasted on QBs, and it's the process fitting the QB to the system that generates success. Championship leader qualities and a process to move through QBs for a single coach's offense until you find a winner is the formula. The ages of these QBs from the Walsh tree when they won their first SB: Montana(25), Young(33), Favre(27), Mahomes(24), Flacco(27), and Stafford (33). Mahomes is the only sports pedigree QB exception on this list. QBs selected in the top 20 picks that weren't a pedigree QB were discarded by the team that drafted them. It will continue to be the same for the QB position as the dynamics of an offense from coach to field to team to clutch moments are not going to change. The combines/draft is just a media show that will only highlight the rare pedigree exceptions at QB for the NFL. You can line up ANY 12 QBs demonstrating success in college with the pro championship level qualities right now & you'll find a couple franchise QBs. Overrated arm strength & athleticism mean absolutely nothing for success at the pro level (that's a bonus). If they had enough of the tangibles to consistently succeed in college, it will translate to the pros. Currently, the Panthers are on QB #1 being shoved into Canales' system. Hooker is Canales' 4th QB (5th if you count Bryce Perkins). The Panthers only need to get Young out of the way and start giving these QBs a shot. If a GM can't fit a QB with the offensive coach in 6 QBs, then it's time to move to a new GM. For Canales' system, I'd go with Cooper Rush(trade), Tyler Huntley(available/ps), Desmond Ridder(available), Jack Coan(available), Aqeel Glass(available), Tanner McKee(trade), Sam Hartman(available/ps), Devin Leary(available), Hendon Hooker(on roster), Clayton Tune(available/ps), Chris Oladokun(available/ps), DJ Uiagalelei(available/ps) and Shane Buechele(available/ps). No particular order. This just demonstrates the winning process at QB to build a winning team. 7 of these QBs have been chosen by SB winning coaches. The point is to line them up and have one head coach with one offensive system move through them as quickly as possible until one of them holds on to the starting position with success and claims the franchise QB title. I expect the top 20 1st round picks for a franchise QB is the only way crowd to attack this and the Bill Walsh tree. Likely going to tell you that 6th round & later QBs as well as the Walsh tree are the sole outliers. We can count more 6th round and later championship QBs(13) than we can the 1st round pedigree QBs(7). As for the other 47 SB QBs, only 15 QBs have been drafted in the top 20 and led their first team to the SB. The best return is the pedigree 1st round QB, but this is rare. As for top 20 pick QBs that aren't pedigree, you're better off running 6th round and later QBs through the offensive system as quick as possible while spending that top 20 1st round pick on core defense or the rare dual threat skill position player. I don't expect the typical media driven fan to agree. I know SB winning coaches keep signing my college QB targets.
    • Best QB I've seen this year so far, with all due respect to Allen and Jackson.
    • What’s with the chargers run game?  They were good last year 
×
×
  • Create New...