Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A non sugar-coated look at Jimmy's season


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/splits?playerId=13198

those are all his stats broken down to a t. read them and come to your own conclusions if you'd like, but here's what I gathered:

jimmy threw 299 passes

of those passes, 69 of those passes were thrown behind the line of scrimmage. that's roughly 23% of his attempts. of those attempts, he completed 71% of them.

of the 299 passes he attempted, 154 of them were from the line of scrimmage to 10 yards. that's roughly 51.5% of all of his pass attempts. of those attempts, he completed only 51.9% of those

in total, jimmy threw the ball either behind the line of scrimmage, or in front of the first down marker, 74.5% of all his passes for a completion percentage of 57.8% for all passes shorter than 10 yards.

It is impossible to win with QB play like that. if your QB is only tossing quick hits for less than 5 yards per attempt, and completing less than 60% of of those easy throws, then something is very very wrong with him.

it's not just the play calling guys, it's the fact that he only attempts short yardage passes, and he's not very good at completing them either. he is too inaccurate, his windup is too slow, and too many of his passes get tipped at the line.

I know you guys are going to argue that he is a rookie and all, but compare his stats with Bradford's:

590 attempts

113 attempts (19.1% of all passes) behind the LOS for completion % of 83.2%

327 attempts (55.4% of all passes) at 1-10 yards for completion % of 59.9%

74.5% of all his passes, too, were from shorter than 10 yards. Here's the interesting thing about that, Bradford managed a completion percentage of 65.9% for all passes shorter than 10 yards with over 5 yards per attempt.

Bitch all you want about the system he was in, that the coaches weren't playing to his strengths and the gameplans sucked, but davidson and fox rolled out a very similar gameplan for clausen that bradford had, in which he would throw quick, easy passes, roughly 75% of the time. The only difference is, Bradford is not inept at throwing the ball accurately.

I don't know about you guys, but I was pretty surprised when I found this out. I thought Fox and Davidson were retarded, but it turns out, they thought that giving jimmy the opportunity to throw quick easy passes 75% of the time was a good idea for a rookie QB, and normally it is, but it doesn't work when your QB sucks like clausen did.

I know it's one year, his rookie year and all, but I have to say, I am not impressed the more I look into his stats and find out that his own shortcomings were the cause of his poor play on the field.

In conclusion, just say no to pickles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We get it--he had a lousy year. Who said otherwise?

The question is, can he get better? A number of you have already made up your minds, despite plenty of reasons not to. The incoming coaching staff obviously hasn't, and neither have several other people on this board.

If you care to understand why we haven't given up, I would be happy to give you plenty of reasons. Or you can just hate on him. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So based on Bradford's averages Jimmy missed out on 41 completions.

Over the 13 games Jimmy played in he averaged 11 complete games, meaning he would have completed an extra 3-4 passes per game, before the 1st down marker, if he performed like Bradford did.

Those 3-4 completions would have given him on average an extra 15-20 yards. Hardly the big difference between the two that you are claiming...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say "meh" to Pickles. He didn't play well enough to stabilize the QB position. Competition needs to be brought in. But it's one freaking year and no matter how eloquently somebody presents their case it's no more intriguing than the other 5,000 times it comes up.

Wait until TC, everybody supporting him or tearing him down are just spinning their wheels.

The 2nd rounder is very likely to remain on the team, and he's also very likely to not be the starter. We have the #1 pick, new coaches, and a ton of cap room. There has got to be better material to discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So based on Bradford's averages Jimmy missed out on 41 completions.

Over the 13 games Jimmy played in he averaged 11 complete games, meaning he would have completed an extra 3-4 passes per game, before the 1st down marker, if he performed like Bradford did.

Those 3-4 completions would have given him on average an extra 15-20 yards. Hardly the big difference between the two that you are claiming...

i think you missed my point.

my argument is based on completion percentage and how he can't actually make easy throws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, 58% to 66% is the difference between an inept and a franchise QB?

in a way, yes. clausen has such a hard time completing the easy passes, it's not wonder he sucks at throwing the harder ones down field. you have to walk before you run, but in this case, clausen is just crawling

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In the past 7 years we wouldn’t have had to TBH. We would have been better off realizing we lost Cam, Luke and many others. It was time to do an actual rebuild and save the cap space so we could keep our “good” (huddle consensus) draft picks like extending Trey Smith and Creed Humphrey instead of having cap space to burn since the long snapper and TMJ didn’t work out. Also, have enough cap space to keep some offensive weapons like CMC and Moore because we don’t have to trade up for a QB or didn’t have to “recover” picks lost in poo trades. One other note here is that, the consensus huddle would have jumped at the chance to get two 1sts and a 2nd for Burns. That alone would have been the best FA/trade move made in the history of the Panthers. It is 100% indisputable fact that a huddle consensus GM, from 2018 to 2024, would have done way better and we’d have a playoff contender right now. Maybe not a SB/NFC winning team but likely the best team in the NFC South rather than a hey we lost close games to the teams in the SB even though our D set a single season points allowed record.
    • https://philpeople.org/profiles/coinbase-wallet-support-how-do-i-connect-to-coinbase-support-faqs-support-guide https://philpeople.org/profiles/coinbase-wallet-support-how-do-i-connect-to-coinbase-support-faqs-support-guide https://philpeople.org/profiles/coinbase-wallet-support-how-do-i-connect-to-coinbase-support-faqs-support-guide https://philpeople.org/profiles/coinbase-wallet-support-how-do-i-connect-to-coinbase-support-faqs-support-guide
    • 🛠️☎️How Do I Contact QB Error Support Number?   For assistance with QuickBooks Error you can contact their support team at 1.833.677.8666 or 1.833*677*8666 𝐨𝐫 1.833.6INTUIT. They are available to help with any questions or issues you may have regarding enterprise solutions and complex business needs.   ➡𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐩 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐐𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬 Error Support, 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐚𝐭 (1.833.677.8666) or (1.833.677.8666). 𝐖𝐞'𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐯𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝟸𝟺/𝟽 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐩, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠.   ➡𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐩 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐐𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐁𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬 Error, 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐚𝐧𝐲𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐚𝐭 1.833.677.8666 or 1.833*677*8666 𝐨𝐫 1.833.6INTUIT. 𝐖𝐞’𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐯𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝟸𝟼/𝟽 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐬𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐩, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠.   https://odoedev.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/chd-discussion/a5bcaa42-56f0-ef11-a4de-001dd806be05 https://odoedev.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/chd-discussion/a5bcaa42-56f0-ef11-a4de-001dd806be05 https://odoedev.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/chd-discussion/a5bcaa42-56f0-ef11-a4de-001dd806be05 https://odoedev.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/chd-discussion/a5bcaa42-56f0-ef11-a4de-001dd806be05 https://odoedev.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/chd-discussion/a5bcaa42-56f0-ef11-a4de-001dd806be05 https://odoedev.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/chd-discussion/a5bcaa42-56f0-ef11-a4de-001dd806be05 https://odoedev.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/chd-discussion/a5bcaa42-56f0-ef11-a4de-001dd806be05 https://odoedev.powerappsportals.us/en-US/forums/chd-discussion/a5bcaa42-56f0-ef11-a4de-001dd806be05
×
×
  • Create New...