Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers Mt. Rushmore??


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

To be honest, only Sam Mills and Steve Smith would be worthy of something like that. Moose? Nope, he left. Kasay? No, you're not putting any kicker on a Panther Mt. Rushmore. Richardson? I guess, but I would hate a non-player. Minter? Was never a dominant player. Greene? No lasting impact. Beuerlein? LOL. Beason? Maybe one day. Peppers? Why put him on if he doesn't want to be here? Delhomme? Not good enough.

So we still have two spots available. I bet if we did this ten years from now you could put Beason on it at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can you have a Panthers Mr. Rushmore without Zod?...

Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments. (Exodus 20:4-6)

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sam Mills. Thats it. The team has been around for 15 years and it is way too soon to put anyone other than Mills, the only player in the Hall of Honor, on a "Panther's Mount Rushmore." And according to the Panthers Mike McCormick would probably be more deserving than JR as far as a non-player. A lot of people give JR the credit for bringing the NFL to the Carolinas but in reality he was mainly just the finanical backer that was a former player. I'm not trying to take anything away from JR but McCormick gets overlooked a lot by the fans and derserves more respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...