Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Delhomme have a better season this year?


Woodcookedbbq

Will Jake have a better season this year?  

80 members have voted

  1. 1. Will Jake have a better season this year?

    • Yes
      40
    • No
      12
    • About the same
      28


Recommended Posts

Hopefully after his blow up to end the season he'll work his ass off to prove himself to his team mates and this town again. The new QB coach could help, too. If he can eliminate those couple 4+ turnover games and play steady then I think we'll be set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d like to think so, but realistically Jake will be the same slightly better-than-average quarterback we’ve had since 2003. With the exception of his three games in the 2007 season, Jake’s passer rating and completion percentage numbers have been pretty similar since he came to the team. And he’s not getting any younger.

People will contend that his numbers might improve with a new quarterbacks coach, or that he’ll improve as he gets used to his bionic elbow. But the truth is that Jake will be Jake, a guy who will both win and lose some games for us all while putting up very average numbers.

If Jake hasn’t “turned the page” at this point in his career, he’s not going to. And that’s not a slight to Jake. Over the years, Jake has played well for the team and served a purpose, but he’s never going to light the world on fire. His five seasons in Carolina show what he is and isn’t capable of, and I have no reason to think his numbers next year won’t fall somewhere around his average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d like to think so, but realistically Jake will be the same slightly better-than-average quarterback we’ve had since 2003. With the exception of his three games in the 2007 season, Jake’s passer rating and completion percentage numbers have been pretty similar since he came to the team. And he’s not getting any younger.

People will contend that his numbers might improve with a new quarterbacks coach, or that he’ll improve as he gets used to his bionic elbow. But the truth is that Jake will be Jake, a guy who will both win and lose some games for us all while putting up very average numbers.

If Jake hasn’t “turned the page” at this point in his career, he’s not going to. And that’s not a slight to Jake. Over the years, Jake has played well for the team and served a purpose, but he’s never going to light the world on fire. His five seasons in Carolina show what he is and isn’t capable of, and I have no reason to think his numbers next year won’t fall somewhere around his average.

this.

end thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he will have a better year. Of his 12 Ints Tampa and Oakland accounted for 9 of them. Other than the playoff debacle he had 9 games with no Ints. His rating was overly affected by a 12 rating against Oakland and a 38 against Tampa the first time.

I don't believe in selective stats so they needed to be included and no one can say he didn't have some horrible games. But in the end if a quarterback coach can help figure out how to limit his bad games, he could have a good year in 2009. When he was good he could be very good, but when he was bad early he seemed to get worse instead of recover. That is often more mental than physical. And a good quarterback coach can and should help with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was average this past season. He has always been average. So I said about the same.

If we can just have a real 3 WR threat at any time, then I believe he will rise above average.

Not to be insulting, but plenty of comments similar to this were tossed around before moose came back, except the number of required WR threats then was "2".

As for Jake's season, I say better. The WR options should hopefully grow (with both Jarrett and Hackett hopefully needing to prove themselves in the offseason and thus improving). Plus, a need to proove yourself after a failure is more motivation than needing to proove yourself after an injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to think there'll be a little more freshness, consistency, and reproducability with the arm without the full year of rehab. I'd also like to think that Scherer has a positive impact on his fundamentals- stepping into the pocket, into throws instead of fading, and so on.

Hard to say, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Him and Sanders are the only QBs I would consider in the first round. I won’t be upset if we take Sanders, unlike some people on the board. Both have potential to be really good NFL QBs if the teams can develop them.  But as we have seen teams are not willing or are unable to now properly develop rookie QBs. 
    • I remember the last time we had a Cam at QB in Charlotte
    • Because Young is so historically bad that it just skews too far outside the normal deviations that perspective is easily lost. That or they just don't want to believe it.  The struggles last year would have been more about the infighting and poor roster building or idiot owner's hiring practices than with Stroud. He wouldn't have been as good but he wouldn't have been ruined here and the pressure was not Carr-esk if you take out the Young created portion from his playing style.  Dude is a young guy on a team coached by a Defensive guy building a good D but not building up the O in year 2 of his HC 1st time gig. Seems familiar... Go look at his output this year and not just some crappy Thursday night implosion game, I would take that in a second and never ever look back every time without a shred of doubt while eating 4 of those games a year with a giant smile on my face. 
×
×
  • Create New...