Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Getting to know the Jim Johnson 4-3


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

Maybe Stewart Bradley won't be here, and the reasoning being

"On February 6, 2009, New York Magazine reported that Bradley is following in the footsteps of the now infamous Sean Avery and has accepted an internship at Elle Magazine, where he'll satisfy his passion for fashion" -wiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stewart_Bradley

......passion for fashion....really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ya after reading this there is almost a 90% chance we draft fairley. i just hope we can get a good cb in fa

also remember this. since like u said about the cba the draft is happening for sure. Haloti Ngata is not for sure. Thus Fairley will be the pick ending any Ngata speculation.
ya i'm pretty sure you skimped over this part....

It says SF was running it so this might have been written prior to 2007 before they switched to 3-4, but this is the best reference I could find. I know reading this is going to galvanize the interest of Fairley fanatics, whom are automatically going to look at the diagram and assume he is going to step into that delicious looking NT spot between the center and right guard and anchor the line and skullf**k the QB with his big toe, instead of reading the text under it. I say this because I estimate at least 25% of the Huddle population doesn't know what a gap is and 75% don't know what a technique is. The position the NT spot is in is the 1-technique. Fairley played in the 3-technique spot in Auburn, which is exactly where the UT is lined up. A lot of scouts have speculated that he is strictly a 3-tech DT at the pro level, kinda like Warren Sapp was, or for a more recent draft comparison, Gerald McCoy, whom TB drafted to fill that spot on their Tampa 2.

fairley isn't a NT. we will still need one.

now here's a nasty scenario...

we draft fairley for the 3 tech and then pick up haynesworth for the NT.

that would be downright obscene. i would love it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.scardraft.com/Johnson43.html

Johnson ran a similar 4-3 under similar to Fox. I suspect we will run the same line formations. One difference was that Fox typically put the nose tackle over the center in a 2 gap 0 technique (lined up over the center responsible for stuffing the A gap which is the space between the center and guard on either side. Whereas Johnson put the center in the A gap on the strong side ( between the center and guard lined on the side where the tight end is lined up on).

For a discussion about gaps and techniques for the 2 people that care here is a good article.

http://en.allexperts.com/q/Football-Instruction-2069/Defensive-Line-Terminology.htm#b

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/In_pro_football_coaches_talk_about_a_one_gap_two_gap_three_gap_defense_what_does_that_mean_and_what_is_the_defference

For more detail for the 2 folks who care:

http://www.johntreed.com/fbdictionary.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ya i'm pretty sure you skimped over this part....

fairley isn't a NT. we will still need one.

now here's a nasty scenario...

we draft fairley for the 3 tech and then pick up haynesworth for the NT.

that would be downright obscene. i would love it.

Isn't Haynesworth main gripe is that he is a 3 tech and washington wasn't letting him play as such? Not positive, just askin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for who we will want? Fairley could play the 3 technique or the 1 technique. He is big and strong enough to play in a 2 gap or 1 gap system. But he would fine in Johnson's system. Could he be a 3-4 nose tackle?? Possible but he would need some work. He reminds me of Kris Jenkins and is best suited for a 4-3 3 technique tackle lined up between the guard and tackle in the B gap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't Haynesworth main gripe is that he is a 3 tech and washington wasn't letting him play as such? Not positive, just askin.
while he'd probably most want to play the 3-tech, i think the NT in a 4-3 would be more appealing than NT in a 3-4 which is what the redskins changed to.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for who we will want? Fairley could play the 3 technique or the 1 technique. He is big and strong enough to play in a 2 gap or 1 gap system. But he would fine in Johnson's system. Could he be a 3-4 nose tackle?? Possible but he would need some work. He reminds me of Kris Jenkins and is best suited for a 4-3 3 technique tackle lined up between the guard and tackle in the B gap.

I think Kris Jenkins has at least 50 to 60 pounds on Fariley.lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...