Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

fairley's stats lie in bcs championship game


Recommended Posts

A quick look at Nick Fairley's stat line in the BCS Championship game shows why he was the game's MVP and a future top-five pick in the draft.

Against Oregon, Fairley finished with five tackles, three tackles for loss, a sack and a forced fumble.

However, if you look past the stat line, it's hard to consider Fairley for the first pick in the draft.

First and foremost, if Carolina moves to a 3-4 defense (as expected), Fairley is a poor scheme fit. As a three-technique tackle, Fairley's game is pressure and quickness. His game isn't based on strength. That showed early in the national title game when Fairley was controlled pretty well in the first quarter.

Of course, his three tackles for loss were impressive, but two of them came when he was completely unblocked. Fairley also got a lot of pressure going one-on-one against Oregon's undersized interior line. What made Oregon think that was a good idea, who knows.

What it did do, though, is inflate Fairley's stats. It pushed his tackles for loss on the year to 24 and his sacks to 11.5.

There is no question that Fairley is a good player. His playing style and effort could immediately give a defense an attitude. Rival teams will hate Fairley and his penchant for cheap shots.

There are questions about whether or not Fairley is a one-year wonder, or if he can take up two gaps in the NFL. Or if he has the power to take on and shed blockers.

The answers to all those questions point to Fairley being a big risk at the top of the draft, let alone as the first pick overall.

here...

this article was written before the rivera revealed carolina would stay with the 4-3 defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am with Arsen. You do know Rivera already said we are sticking with a 4-3. and in 3 and 10's we will use some 3-4 looks to get pressure. Your Clueless. You should take this post down. We are playing a 4-3 defense. If you watched the press conf. you would know this. And why would Ron meeks be coming back if it was a 3-4? You really shouldnt say things that you are making up. Have a good day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am with Arsen. You do know Rivera already said we are sticking with a 4-3. and in 3 and 10's we will use some 3-4 looks to get pressure. Your Clueless. You should take this post down. We are playing a 4-3 defense. If you watched the press conf. you would know this. And why would Ron meeks be coming back if it was a 3-4? You really shouldnt say things that you are making up. Have a good day.

um..at the bottom of the Article he did say that this article came out before Ron Rivera became Head Coach. Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am throwing this out here, by all means I think Fairly is a dominant player but some people can and WILL argue about Oregon's undersized line and the fact that they didn't even block him on a couple of plays. Some will even go out and say that he will never experience that type of success in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oregon thought they could make plays around Fairley. They were confident in their offense and assumed they could move the ball down the field quicker than Fairley could penetrate to f*** s*** up. They thought they could single-team him and try to seal the edges with pulling guards. They were wrong and they lost the national championship because of it. (fairley was not the biggest or only reason Auburn won, fwiw)

in evaluating Fairley, the national championship game is not really compelling evidence of what he's capable of. it's more a sign of how dangerous he can be if you don't gameplan to contain him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am throwing this out here, by all means I think Fairly is a dominant player but some people can and WILL argue about Oregon's undersized line and the fact that they didn't even block him on a couple of plays. Some will even go out and say that he will never experience that type of success in the NFL.

Don't go by one game. Fairley led the SEC in sacks as a DT. That's pretty darn impressive since that conference is known for it's linemen on both sides of the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you who are not sold on Canales are insane. His main purpose was to turn around Bryce Young’s career and he did that. Of all of the teams in the top 10 of the NFL draft, we were the team that was consistently showing the most fight week in and week out. Our players never quit on the season. The offense which he is responsible for took a huge step forward compared to last year, despite the lack of skill talent  that we have. It was our defense that was a mess. That’s one of my critiques on Canales. He should’ve gotten rid of Evero and hired his own DC that shares the same vision. But as a whole, I can’t see how people are not pleased with what Canales did with this team. I’d give him an 9/10
    • One of the first thoughts after the game yesterday was that JT was going to jump all over it. He's been more favorable about BY from the beginning, and so yesterday must've felt like Christmas.
    • Maybe, but they were always going to be an impossible team to accurately mocked right now. They have an absurd amount of cap room, what they need right now will not be what they need come draft day.  They can make multiple big splash signings and even make trades for players who need new contracts and their teams don't want to give it to them. OT and WR might be their two biggest needs right now, but it wouldn't be unreasonable to think they could go into the draft needing neither of them.  I think a LT will be their top FA priority, also think they're going to make a big offer to Higgins, and I could see them being a team in the running to trade for someone like DK Metcalf as they need a WR like him and they have the cap space to give him a big new contract.
×
×
  • Create New...