Let's say Bradford, Suh and McCoy were in this draft class....

[Soul Rebel]

I was pondering this earlier today amidst all of the frustration at what to do with our #1 pick. So, all things are the same for our team (current roster, needs, position, etc.). Just add Bradford, Suh and McCoy to this class as if they were coming out of college. Knowing our gaping hole at DT, young inexperienced quarterback, 3 wide receivers that we took last year, etc. who would you take at #1 overall. Would you add Sam Bradford? Would you lock in the anchor that is Ndamukong Suh? Maybe Gerald McCoy? AJ Green still? Nick Fairley still warrant the #1 overall? Is Peterson still in the mix at CB/S?

Thoughts?

Comments?

Negative Rep?

[C47]

I was pondering this earlier today amidst all of the frustration at what to do with our #1 pick. So, all things are the same for our team (current roster, needs, position, etc.). Just add Bradford, Suh and McCoy to this class as if they were coming out of college. Knowing our gaping hole at DT, young inexperienced quarterback, 3 wide receivers that we took last year, etc. who would you take at #1 overall. Would you add Sam Bradford? Would you lock in the anchor that is Ndamukong Suh? Maybe Gerald McCoy? AJ Green still? Nick Fairley still warrant the #1 overall? Is Peterson still in the mix at CB/S?

Thoughts?

Comments?

Negative Rep?

Take Bradford or Suh, that would really be a tossup imo. Suh is that good....

[Murph]

Bradford and Suh would be the top 2 picks in both drafts (even without knowing how good their rookie years were in the NFL).

[SuperMan]

It would be Bradford hands down....

Suh a close second though.

[The_Cannon]

Suh...Bradford would be a close second. It would honestly be a decision right up until I had to make the phone call

[BBQ&Beer]

If they were in this draft I'd be a lot more optimistic about trading down.

[Snake]

Everyone would be telling each other how they are bust and Clausen and Locker are so much better.

[Cat'sGrowl]

Bradford.

Duh.

Suh is good, but his position is nowhere near as important as QB.

Some of you are delusional!!

[PanthersGuy28]

That's a tough one, I might would think Suh. I still think Bradford is gonna have injury problems down the road.

[bleys]

Easier to see Suh will be great than to say the same for Bradford.. QB is a bigger need though..

I guess you'd have to go with Bradford based on need.. our defense is good, this big gaping hole at DT doesn't change that and there are options in FA.. all of that should cancel out drafting a DT..

[House]

Bradford has a chance to be a really good QB for years to come.

Suh has the abilities to become the greatest DT ever.

I would take Suh in a heartbeat over Bradford. Suh, Landri, Johnson, and Hardy would be a NIGHTMARE front 4. Especially if you could nab up a better FA DT. Landri though was pretty good and next to Suh could be a pretty decent DT.

With the #1 overall, I would want the guy that has a chance to be the GOAT at his position, not the guy that could be pretty good in a few years.

[bleys]

here's the thing, you don't have to have the greatest DT ever to have at top defense.. you can do well by FA..

you have to have a top QB regardless...

This question really points out a lot on how people think... you can get that DT, but you're still stuck.. not so if you grab that QB..

[The Saltman]

Suh

[Lumps]

I'd rather have Tom Brady as QB.