Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I Hate to Burst Your Bubble (Fairley)


Catalyst

Recommended Posts

Seriously, the work ethic issues = bullshit. I just re-watched the entire National Championship game this morning and all I did was fast forward to every snap when Auburn was on defense. Yes it is but one game, but all I did was focus on Fairley and removed everything else that goes along with watching a game of that magnitude. He was phenomenal! A few plays he did overplay on and got burned on a delay or a counter that was run to perfection. Though he didn't make the tackle, he caused that safety. He had 2 sacks and a forced fumble. He was in the Oregon backfield so much against a team that was averaging over 300 yards ON THE GROUND. A player that hasn't played a game snap in almost 40 days showed up in beast mode. A lazy player does not. Again, one game, but if you say he is lazy, please back it up with some evidence. It seems more to me that one of Kiper's minions or a couple of guys on message boards through out the "lazy" tag and it has stuck, without any true proof to back it up. If there is evidence to Fairley's laziness, please show it or point me in the direction that I can find it, and I will gladly eat crow on that.
YOU CRAZY? We need dat AJ green, he gon be da one dats gonna score us points.

Just a similar type reply I'm expecting to that great post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

blackcatgrowl.. for the love of god, stop smoking crack..

there have been a few times I've agreed with you, so you know I'm not just hating on you.. but for fugs sake.. where you come up with the poo you come up with baffles the hell out of me..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks, a lot of you make the mistake of thinking we are drafting for 2011 needs only and we don't have free agent money. We do. You draft for next 10 years. Yes, we have Smith, the guy who bitches about his QB to the press and sucker punches teammates. A 32 year old former superstar current cancer. DT is deep in this draft, and Dareus is the only DT who has proven to do much more than shoot gaps. #1 WRs like Green come around 2-3 times each decade.

Pass on Green and you will regret it every time you watch SportsCenter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks, a lot of you make the mistake of thinking we are drafting for 2011 needs only and we don't have free agent money. We do. You draft for next 10 years. Yes, we have Smith, the guy who bitches about his QB to the press and sucker punches teammates. A 32 year old former superstar current cancer. DT is deep in this draft, and Dareus is the only DT who has proven to do much more than shoot gaps. #1 WRs like Green come around 2-3 times each decade.

Pass on Green and you will regret it every time you watch SportsCenter.

No dude you're really wrong

despite having a really shitty passing game, and even though we were middle of the pack in overall defense, this being despite the fact that our defense was on the field more than 27 other teams, had more plays from scrimmage run against us than 27 other teams, and only had 6 more teams give up less yards per play than we did, and just hired a defensive head coach and have a lot of good free agency options we need this Fairley guy and we just need him and i love him and want to have his babies because he's a DT and that's what you need a DT and we need it because we need it because DTs are DTs and you don't miss with DTs and everyone picks DTs no.1 overall so we should do it too and we need to have it because we need it now because the defense needs it because they're bad because I just watched the BCS championship and Fairley was a beast did you see him i mean he's just a stud DT and that's the key to winning this game is a STUD DT nevermind offense who needs to score points we just need DEFENSE ALL TEH TIMEEEEEEE BABY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. A draft prospect thread that makes sense. Except I don't see us taking a WR with the #1. That would be stupid considering we need a franchise QB who can throw 1st.

good, so we get Orton, then we have someone to throw 1st.. then we grab Green.. that what your saying? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No dude you're really wrong

despite having a really shitty passing game, and even though we were middle of the pack in overall defense, this being despite the fact that our defense was on the field more than 27 other teams, had more plays from scrimmage run against us than 27 other teams, and only had 6 more teams give up less yards per play than we did, and just hired a defensive head coach and have a lot of good free agency options we need this Fairley guy and we just need him and i love him and want to have his babies because he's a DT and that's what you need a DT and we need it because we need it because DTs are DTs and you don't miss with DTs and everyone picks DTs no.1 overall so we should do it too and we need to have it because we need it now because the defense needs it because they're bad because I just watched the BCS championship and Fairley was a beast did you see him i mean he's just a stud DT and that's the key to winning this game is a STUD DT nevermind offense who needs to score points we just need DEFENSE ALL TEH TIMEEEEEEE BABY

why couldn't I have said this as well as you?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No dude you're really wrong

despite having a really shitty passing game, and even though we were middle of the pack in overall defense, this being despite the fact that our defense was on the field more than 27 other teams, had more plays from scrimmage run against us than 27 other teams, and only had 6 more teams give up less yards per play than we did, and just hired a defensive head coach and have a lot of good free agency options we need this Fairley guy and we just need him and i love him and want to have his babies because he's a DT and that's what you need a DT and we need it because we need it because DTs are DTs and you don't miss with DTs and everyone picks DTs no.1 overall so we should do it too and we need to have it because we need it now because the defense needs it because they're bad because I just watched the BCS championship and Fairley was a beast did you see him i mean he's just a stud DT and that's the key to winning this game is a STUD DT nevermind offense who needs to score points we just need DEFENSE ALL TEH TIMEEEEEEE BABY

Damn that was impressive.....nearly 15 lines of prose and not one punctuation mark. That takes talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are assuming that teams let their best DTs walk. Which may or may not happen...and if we don't get a new CBA, no one goes anywhere. Then what?

I admit i was assuming that the CBA will go through and that a player that fits the profile of an upgrade in the middle will reach FA. Call me crazy but i thought we had some room in the salary cap to make a move. Also is the Big Cat not highly involved in the talks. As a organization we need to make some waves. We will do that. Drafting a DT with your first overall is not gonna make the highlights. It does not happen for a reason.

Let me ask you if you think Rivera and his staff are incompetent. I do not think they are gonna make Fairley their project to show what our defense can do. If they were gonna take on a talented defensive player Dont ya think Patrick Peterson would be more interesting? The Chargers have always loved drafting Corners high. The defense needs really solid corners. Personally if i was looking at it purely based on NEED which that is what Fairley is i would go with Patrick or Green. Check out the young secondarys of the Chiefs and Patriots and tell me we should not emulate.

Of course we need a pass rush from the middle it is a highly effective way to pressure the QB. But this is NOT the SEC. This is not Oregon Olines.

The guys body of work for me is too short. To be honest i just don't see the immeasurable's. I mean does he have the dedication to the sport or the MONEY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I admit i was assuming that the CBA will go through and that a player that fits the profile of an upgrade in the middle will reach FA. Call me crazy but i thought we had some room in the salary cap to make a move. Also is the Big Cat not highly involved in the talks. As a organization we need to make some waves. We will do that. Drafting a DT with your first overall is not gonna make the highlights. It does not happen for a reason.

Let me ask you if you think Rivera and his staff are incompetent. I do not think they are gonna make Fairley their project to show what our defense can do. If they were gonna take on a talented defensive player Dont ya think Patrick Peterson would be more interesting? The Chargers have always loved drafting Corners high. The defense needs really solid corners. Personally if i was looking at it purely based on NEED which that is what Fairley is i would go with Patrick or Green. Check out the young secondarys of the Chiefs and Patriots and tell me we should not emulate.

Of course we need a pass rush from the middle it is a highly effective way to pressure the QB. But this is NOT the SEC. This is not Oregon Olines.

The guys body of work for me is too short. To be honest i just don't see the immeasurable's. I mean does he have the dedication to the sport or the MONEY.

I look back at the Chicago Bear's defenses under Rivera. They were predicated on a disruptive DLine....great LB's...and adequate corners (yes Tillman and Vasher were adequate...not great).

Adding Fairley with Johnson, Brayton, and Brown could provide a line that would provide pressure on the QB. Davis-Beason-Anderson are very good and very fast LB's.

So, if he is more like his days in Chicago....I could see him want Fairley.

If he will run a D more like SD....I could see Petterson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...