Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

lol peppers wtf


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2011/01/12/julius-peppers-notes-lack-of-effort-by-saints-on-marshawn-lync/

I thought Marshawn Lynch's 67-yard touchdown run against the Saints on Sunday was one of the greatest individual efforts in NFL history.

Bears defensive end Julius Peppers wasn't quite as impressed.

It's not that Peppers didn't think Lynch, the Seahawks running back who will be playing at Chicago on Sunday in the divisional round of the playoffs, had a great highlight-reel run. But from Peppers' perspective, as a defensive player, he thought the run was at least as much about the Saints' inability to tackle as about Lynch's performance.

"It was a great run ... the effort that he displayed was amazing," Peppers told the Chicago Tribune. "So, it's also a lack of effort on the other side by a couple of guys. I don't think we will have that problem this week."

1z225ig.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not that i don't believe him

he's actually a good reference because since he did it so often in carolina he should know

haha, at least Pep sacked the qb when he got there. I cant count how many times I've seen Charles Johnson get instant penetration and just get sidestepped by a slow qb and miss a sack completely. Thank god he doesnt do that anymore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What the fug?? When the hell did Peppers start talking like a normal human being instead of the "Umm..uhh..yeah...umm.. that was a good run" crap that he used to always give the Charlotte media??

He was talking to Charlotte Disturber reporters. He brought it down to their level. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the first time the Bears and Seahawks met Lynch accumulated an earth shattering 44 yards on 17 carries. Peppers isn't lying, that was a great run but some piss poor tackling. I just don't see the Bears defense giving up 67 yards on one run in this game let alone missing 8 tackles on one play. The Saints defense played bad that game but so did Seattle's for the most part. the Bears held Green Bay's high powered offense to 10 points on the road just two weeks ago, I think they match up well enough with Seattle's offense as well. Should Seattle win I'm pulling for them to take the whole thing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There wasn't a moment of the day that I couldn't at least hear helicopters.
    • Spoken like someone who hasn't watched nearly enough of T-Mac other than a few short highlight clips to know his game. The only thing he doesn't have is the short area quickness in the way that you're looking for, as you seem to want that Jefferson/Chase type of WR, which sure, he's not that. But him and XL are nothing alike, let alone having the same strengths and weaknesses.  In particular, T-Mac's #1 strength is LITERALLY XL's #1 weakness, their hands.  T-Mac has vice grips for hands, catches darn near everything, and does it all with hands catches, the opposite of XL.   Beyond that, you mention prioritizing route running, of which, T-Mac already runs a complete NFL route tree at a high level.  Yes, he needs to work on his get off the line at the snap and get a little crisper on some of his cuts to create separation, but again, all players need to work on something, that's just what his is.  It doesn't change that he is already a great route runner, there are just some small elements of it that he can improve on. Even then, it's like I've been saying, the trade off of not having that true elite separation like the smaller WR's get, is how good he is at using his body to keep the DB's from being able to break up passes and just making contested catches in general.  You lose a little bit of separation, but his 6'5" body gives him advantages that the smaller WRs just don't have. Again, your post here insinuates that T-Mac is a slow, plodding big WR who isn't a proficient route runner, which couldn't be further from the truth.  I have no issue with people wanting other players over T-Mac, or just not wanting him at all.  But they need to be logical reasons, not made up ones in your head because you don't actually know the player and his abilities.
    • I'm pretty sure that was the best season he's ever gonna have.  
×
×
  • Create New...