Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Dominate" is not a fucking adjective no matter how many times you misuse it


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

dom·i·nate

–verb (used with object)

1.

to rule over; govern; control.

2.

to tower above; overlook; overshadow: A tall pine dominated the landscape.

3.

to predominate, permeate, or characterize.

4.

Mathematics . (of a series, vector, etc.) to have terms or components greater in absolute value than the corresponding terms or components of a given series, vector, etc.

5.

Linguistics . (of a node in a tree diagram) to be connected with (a subordinate node) either directly by a single downward branch or indirectly by a sequence of downward branches.

dom·i·nant

–adjective

1.

ruling, governing, or controlling; having or exerting authority or influence: dominant in the chain of command.

2.

occupying or being in a commanding or elevated position.

3.

predominant; main; major; chief: Corn is the dominant crop of Iowa.

4.

Genetics . of or pertaining to a dominant.

5.

Music . pertaining to or based on the dominant: the dominant chord.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/search.php?searchid=1056185

You people sound enough like idiots in your single-minded perspective to want to spend a first overall pick on defense, basically ignoring our 32nd ranked offense until at least the 65th pick. Don't let your ineptitude at syntax blow your cover.

There isn't an offensive player in this draft worth taking #1. To do so would make us worse off than when Millen ran the Lions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There wasn't a moment of the day that I couldn't at least hear helicopters.
    • Spoken like someone who hasn't watched nearly enough of T-Mac other than a few short highlight clips to know his game. The only thing he doesn't have is the short area quickness in the way that you're looking for, as you seem to want that Jefferson/Chase type of WR, which sure, he's not that. But him and XL are nothing alike, let alone having the same strengths and weaknesses.  In particular, T-Mac's #1 strength is LITERALLY XL's #1 weakness, their hands.  T-Mac has vice grips for hands, catches darn near everything, and does it all with hands catches, the opposite of XL.   Beyond that, you mention prioritizing route running, of which, T-Mac already runs a complete NFL route tree at a high level.  Yes, he needs to work on his get off the line at the snap and get a little crisper on some of his cuts to create separation, but again, all players need to work on something, that's just what his is.  It doesn't change that he is already a great route runner, there are just some small elements of it that he can improve on. Even then, it's like I've been saying, the trade off of not having that true elite separation like the smaller WR's get, is how good he is at using his body to keep the DB's from being able to break up passes and just making contested catches in general.  You lose a little bit of separation, but his 6'5" body gives him advantages that the smaller WRs just don't have. Again, your post here insinuates that T-Mac is a slow, plodding big WR who isn't a proficient route runner, which couldn't be further from the truth.  I have no issue with people wanting other players over T-Mac, or just not wanting him at all.  But they need to be logical reasons, not made up ones in your head because you don't actually know the player and his abilities.
    • I'm pretty sure that was the best season he's ever gonna have.  
×
×
  • Create New...