Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kolb Wants Out Of Philly?


Ruff

Recommended Posts

i don't like drafting WRs with high picks. If you have a great offensive line, solid qb, and creative coaching, you can get players open and get them the ball.

We need to get rid of this retarded philosophy of throwing the ball up and praying some miracle maker like Moose or Smitty will come down with it. We need open WRs and accurate passes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

offer a 1st next year.. no way we give up this year's 1st for Kolb.. and no way we give up more than that..

I'm not sold he's even worth a 1st.. I'd gladly give up a 2nd though considering the high probability that wouldn't be enough..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

offer a 1st next year.. no way we give up this year's 1st for Kolb.. and no way we give up more than that..

I'm not sold he's even worth a 1st.. I'd gladly give up a 2nd though considering the high probability that wouldn't be enough..

I'd rather send them this year's 1st..

Green is the only blue-chip prospect in this year's class..

Next year's class should be deeper.

Not to mention having two firsts next year gives us some extreme firepower to move on Luck..

The thought of not picking until the 3rd though sucks..That Armanti trade keeps getting stupider and stupider..

We would have 2 picks in the 3rd though..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather send them this year's 1st..

Green is the only blue-chip prospect in this year's class..

Next year's class should be deeper.

Not to mention having two firsts next year gives us some extreme firepower to move on Luck..

The thought of not picking until the 3rd though sucks..That Armanti trade keeps getting stupider and stupider..

We would have 2 picks in the 3rd though..

this years 1st for Kolb would feel to me like the Armanti trade last year..

I think I might go on a shooting spree if I hear Hurney traded this year's first for Kolb..

I don't even feel like Kolb is worth a 1st in the first place.. he doesn't deserve a 1st, philly is just hyping their players, Kolb hasn't proven anything..

a 1st for Kolb is a joke, IMO.. especially the #1 overall.. hell no.

that's JMO though.. Philly shouldn't get anything but a 2nd round pick for him.. and if some team is stupid enough to hand over a 1st, well there is a good chance it's not a very successful team, and trades like that would be the reason why..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather send them this year's 1st..

Green is the only blue-chip prospect in this year's class..

Next year's class should be deeper.

Not to mention having two firsts next year gives us some extreme firepower to move on Luck..

The thought of not picking until the 3rd though sucks..That Armanti trade keeps getting stupider and stupider..

We would have 2 picks in the 3rd though..

Kolb wasn't even a blue chip prospect in his own draft class. From what I've seen of him, I , personally, just don't think he's worth it. We've all seen Moore have good games , we've seen him have bad games. That was with our crummy system. Basically, we'd be giving away the #1 overall pick for Matt Moore v2.0. If we were to get Andy Reid as our HC, or a coach that is very similar to Andry Reid, I'd be game. Then again, if we had a HC like that, chances are, he could make all of our Qbs look presentable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure Kevin Kolb has shown to be the kind of player a team looking for a QB is especially inclined to pursue, and definitely not for the price Philly is said to be asking. Kolb wasn't a blue chip prospect, and he has been extremely inconsistent on the occasion he's played, in a QB friendly offense with great weapons at that. He may end up being a solid QB, but I can't say I am inclined to invest in that.

Considering the alternatives at this point, I believe the franchise will be best served signing an experienced QB to compete with Clausen. I am interested in seeing how Clausen looks with a year's experience, and a legitimate OC and QB coach. If he hasn't progressed, we'll have a definitive answer on Clausen, can compete with the experienced QB for a year, and will focus on finding a QB of the future next year. I believe that's a greater option than paying a premium price for the QBs available this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Philly traded Mcnabb with the plan to start Kolb,He looked good until the injury.

I'd be fine with Kolb but not at that price ,I've never shared my bottom price when I had something to sell,maybe they'll get it ,but we've already made our stupid mistakes

for this decade ,Wisdom and Patience are first cousins

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...