Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nic Fairley has got to be our next choice.


tattoorhino

Recommended Posts

I like Fairley, I think he'll be good in the league, but he's not the elite prospect you'd want as a #1 overall. I don't see him being a dominating perennial pro-bowler or anything. Jenkins you brought up was a 2nd rounder. I'd give him a mid to late 1st round grade so that's a pretty massive reach. If Suh was on the board that's one thing but there's no DT close to that level this year.

Some good DTs will hit free agency this year. Get one of them and get a better prospect as your top pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so your solution to the QB problem is...just stick with clausen?

a vet does need to be brought in. thats for sure, but not as a franchise QB. we aren't going to find one in FA (none there worth it) and we aren't going to trade for one (far too expensive an option).

at some point we need to quit dicking around and get serious about getting one. clausen isn't it. we've got to find someone. the longer we put it off, the longer we'll be looking at 3 NFCS teams from below.

You know, there's something to be said for a kid being a winner in college like Cam Newton has been... it was the same argument with The Golden Calf of Bristol and right now The Golden Calf of Bristol looks a heck of allot better than Clausen does even though Clausen projected better to the NFL...

Winners find a way to win, Newton is doing what he's been asked to do in college, that doesn't mean he couldn't do anything else. If our QB is going to be running for his life anyways, he might as well be 6'6" and 250 lbs and able to run like a deer. The biggest knocks against Cam is that he plays in a spread offense and as such isn't asked to read through progressions, but this doesn't mean he couldn't take snaps from under center and read through progressions... it could take some time to adjust but I think Newton has a very high potential ceiling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We definatley need a presence at DT and Nick Fairley is the best DT available in the draft this year. We're going to have to get used to the idea that we'll probably be using the # 1 pick on a guy who wouldn't ordinarily be worthy of the # 1 pick. Don't think anybody is going to be willing to trade up to # 1 for this draft class.

What I'm wondering about is whether or not Bowers could be drafted and coverted into a DT (UT). He's 6'4" 280 lbs and is known more for his strength than his speed. Here's an excerpt from his Scouts, Inc. report:

"Excellent versatility for his size. Is best-suited to play power end in a 4-3 but is very effective when moved inside, particularly rushing the passer as a 3-technique. Might also be able to fit as a 5-technique in a 3-4. Has some experience dropping into coverage but is most comfortable working up the field."

Scouts, Inc. has both Fairley and Bowers graded at a 97 but I think there are some real character concerns about Fairley which makes it a little scary to spend a high pick on him.

Just food for thought...

No character issues whatsoever with Fairley. It would be a mistake to not pick him if he comes out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No character issues whatsoever with Fairley. It would be a mistake to not pick him if he comes out.

Maybe I'm mistaken, could have sworn I heard something about character issues with him?

If there are no character issues, then it seem obvious we should take Fairley over Bowers since DT is a bigger need than DE for us right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rumor is Fairley is a dirty player. Heck I wouldnt mind someone with a nasty streak on defense. Do you really think Newton is a franchise qb?

absolutely. upside is through the roof. it's not a safe pick and without significant risk by any means, but, imo he's worth finding out. every player in the draft this year or any year is a risk for the #1 and just as likely to bust as not.

i'm tired of this team playing it safe in regards to the QB position. either take a risk or settle for a good few years more of mediocrity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rumor is Fairley is a dirty player. Heck I wouldnt mind someone with a nasty streak on defense. Do you really think Newton is a franchise qb?

He does play with a mean streak, but thats a good thing if he's your team-mate. He's the kind of player that panthers fans will love and opposing fans will hate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Fairley is a dirty player. Watched him against UGA and Murray took some unnecessary hits from him.

I'd still take him over Marcell Dareus. Dareus played in the 3-4 at Bama as a DE. Hopefully he's versatile enough to play DT in a 4-3.

Although neither of them are dominant enough to be a #1 overall pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, if we can't get a QB to compete at the level of the rest of the QB's in our division, then the next best thing is to get defensive players that can give those QB's hell... same theory under which Houston drafted Mario Williams # 1 overall, at the time they knew they couldn't find a QB to compete head to head with Peyton Manning so the next best thing was to find someone that could get after Peyton Manning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, if we can't get a QB to compete at the level of the rest of the QB's in our division, then the next best thing is to get defensive players that can give those QB's hell... same theory under which Houston drafted Mario Williams # 1 overall, at the time they knew they couldn't find a QB to compete head to head with Peyton Manning so the next best thing was to find someone that could get after Peyton Manning.
LOL, I would love to see this happen to Drew Brees or Matt Ryan... just to be clear I don't want to see anybody injured, just hurt.

i guess i could get on board with this. if we are going to go with a DT, i'd rather him be the nastiest SoB around.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe it or not, this player was drafted #1 overall in 2022. LG much like players not playing in bowl games and not doing combine drills, its maybe a new normal. Draft is more than college stats..... ITS more magic seeing eye future BS!!!1!11!  
    • https://support.google.com/admanager/thread/328566182/how-much-is-the-cancellation-fee-for-%F0%9D%99%BB%F0%9D%9A%9E%F0%9D%9A%8F%F0%9D%9A%9D%F0%9D%9A%91%F0%9D%9A%8A%F0%9D%9A%97%F0%9D%9A%9C%F0%9D%9A%8A
    • Could this be real or smokescreen  or Warren, come on down Panthers’ Canales putting emphasis on versatility as Carolina looks to evolve TE spot BY MIKE KAYE [email protected] 11hrs ago Dave Canales doesn’t want one-note tight ends in his offense. As the second-year head coach continues to evolve his playbook in Carolina, he’s prioritizing versatility at a key spot on the Panthers’ depth chart. While wide receiver upgrades have become a popular topic in the Queen City, especially on social media, the folks on Mint Street might have a better shot at improving their overall offensive attack with a facelift at tight end. With Tommy Tremble and Ian Thomas headed to free agency later this month, Ja’Tavion Sanders — last year’s fourth-round pick — is the only notable player under contract at the position in 2025. And the lack of solidified players on the depth chart offers up an opportunity to further craft the position in Canales’ image. The offensive play-caller painted a crystal-clear picture of that image last week at the NFL Scouting Combine. “Versatility and toughness, first and foremost,” Canales said. “We’re going to run the ball, so we certainly can’t just take receiving tight ends who give you no value in the run game. At a minimum, this has to be a guy that’s really tough. It doesn’t mean that he’s got to be the 260-pound bruiser that plays in-line. Those guys are cool, too, but if he’s going to be 235 pounds, he has to play with the level of violence because we are going to run the ball a lot. So the versatility is really important for me at the tight end.”   While the veteran free agency class isn’t particularly stocked with notable names that fit that standard, the NFL Draft, according to most media evaluators, has a plethora of those versatile talents, most notably Penn State tight end Tyler Warren. Canales sees a Swiss Army knife of sorts when he watches film the 6-foot-6, 261-pound playmaker. “I think he’s an incredible player,” Canales said. “I think speaking of versatility, here’s a guy that can play close to the interior and play physical because of his sheer size, but then, he does create some mismatches in the pass game, you can hand him the ball. So if you look at some of the teams that are using tight ends for QB sneak — that would be a weapon for somebody in a short-yardage situation to utilize him. So, he’s a very interesting prospect.” Warren — who is currently projected as a top-10 prospect by Pro Football Focus — produced 1,233 receiving yards, 218 rushing yards and 13 total touchdowns (including a passing score) last year for the Nittany Lions. He might be gone by the time the Panthers pick at No. 8 in the first round, or Carolina might prioritize another position with that selection And if the Panthers pass on Warren, they’ll still have plenty of strong options during the rest of draft weekend. Michigan’s Colston Loveland, Texas’s Gunnar Helm, and Miami’s Elijah Arroyo are all projected as top-100 picks. All three would add a playmaking threat to Canales’ offensive play-calling concoction. There’s also Tremble, whom both Canales and general manager Dan Morgan openly expressed desire in bringing back during their time at the combine last week.  Tremble dealt with nagging injuries throughout last season, but still produced a career-high 234 receiving yards. He also has the blocking and receiving versatility that Canales craves. But the Panthers want to make sure they get a fair deal done for both sides. Sometimes, that’s not as easy as it sounds. “Yeah, it’s a challenge, right? Because you want continuity,” Canales said. “Talk about a guy like Tommy Tremble. We’re going through all of our film and he does such a great job. So, now it’s all of a sudden it’s like, in all fairness, like, ‘Let’s let Tommy see what’s out there from a free agency standpoint.’ But for me it’s like, ‘OK, we have these guys that we’ve trained for a year, and you’d love to have them back.’” Sanders set a new franchise rookie record with 342 receiving yards last season. He also improved as a blocker from his college days. While he has shown he can be a key cog in the Carolina offense, the Panthers aren’t going to just settle for continuity, even if that’s seemingly a foundational priority for Canales. Bringing back Sanders and Tremble with minimal enhancement otherwise would be a disservice to the offense’s evolution. Canales knows that and Morgan knows that.
×
×
  • Create New...