Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What song are you listening to/is stuck in your head?


boo7382

Recommended Posts

This one for some reason...

that one brings back some memories

:lol: I'm musically diverse, boo! That's awesome that you like Jethro Tull. It's strange knowing a younger audience that respects them.

Yeah, that one I can attribute to my pops. He had this tape in his car all the time when I was little that had Aqualung and one more single on it, listened to it over and over

Locomotive Breath is also an amazing song, would love to see it live

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that one I can attribute to my pops. He had this tape in his car all the time when I was little that had Aqualung and one more single on it, listened to it over and over

Locomotive Breath is also an amazing song, would love to see it live

Yea, I love the jazzy piano at the beginning of Locomotive Breath. I wish they'd tour North America. My pops has seen them, but I've never had the chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pandora keeps this from happening to me. Once though, my cousin did an acoustic teenage dream, and put it on facebook. it was stuck for a couple days, and now i give him poo about it when i see him.

Um, well, they actually did do an acapella version on Glee and my boss was playing for about a week over and over. I dont watch the show but I was very familiar with that song after about 2 hours of over and over.

Care to share? :D

haha, I just mean memories of back in the day. My bro and I used to jam out to STP Purple album and the Tiny Music one too but Purple was big

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...